KAHC010026042017_1
9 Mar 2018...
Search Results for "Gujarat High Court Rules"
2578 result(s) found
Found 2578 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Quash FIR in Sushant Singh Rajput Death Case — Allegations of Abetment to Suicide and Drug Nexus Require Investigation. Court holds that FIR prima facie discloses cognizable offences under IPC and NDPS Act, and quashing at threshold is not warranted.
15 Feb 2021The petitioners, sisters of the deceased actor Sushant Singh Rajput, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Se...
- 64
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Employees' Union and Individual Claimant in Company Liquidation Dispute — Upholds Official Liquidator's Decision to Reject Claims as Time-Barred Under Section 529A of Companies Act, 1956. The court held that workmen's dues, though entitled to priority, must be claimed within the limitation period prescribed under Rule 148 of the Company Court Rules, 1959.
8 Aug 2019The case involves two appeals filed by the Kamani Employees' Union and Mrs. Triveni A. Kulkarni against the Official Liquidator and others. The disput...
- 125
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Senior Citizens Maintenance Case — Gift Deed Valid Despite Lack of Acceptance. The Court held that a gift deed executed by a senior citizen in favor of one son is valid under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, and the Tribunal's order directing maintenance and setting aside the gift deed was not warranted.
20 Dec 2024The appellant, Sri K. Lokesh, filed a writ appeal against the order of the learned Single Judge in WP No.3165/2023 dated 02.02.2024, which upheld the ...
- 152
High Court
High Court of Karnataka adjourns writ petition filed by employees of Bharat Electronics Limited for preliminary hearing; no final order passed. Petition seeks mandamus and certiorari based on allegations of discrimination and violation of service rules.
7 Oct 2020The writ petition was filed by 52 employees of Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL), a Government of India enterprise under the Ministry of Defence. They ...
- 51
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses IAS Officer's Challenge to Compulsory Retirement in Public Interest. Service Record Including Adverse Entries and Minor Punishment Justified Action Under Rule 16(3) of All India Services (Death-Cum-Retirement Benefits) Rules, 1958.
12 Sep 2005The petitioner, Paramjeet Singh Bhogal, an IAS officer of the 1967 batch allotted to Maharashtra Cadre, challenged the order of compulsory retirement ...
- 122
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Reserved Category Candidate Who Availed Age Relaxation: Cannot Claim General Category Seat. Age Relaxation Under Gujarat Policy Is a Relaxation in Standard, Not a Mere Concession, and Candidates Availing It Must Be Adjusted Against Reserved Posts.
4 Jul 2019The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Niravkumar Dilipbhai Makwana against the Gujarat Public Service Commission and others, upholding the D...
- 387
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Appeal in Unfair Labour Practice Case Concerning Probation and Permanency. Employees Entitled to Confirmation After Three-Month Probation Under Model Standing Order 4A, Not Six-Month Contractual Period, and Parity in Benefits Under Settlement.
18 Aug 2021The dispute arose in an industrial establishment governed by the Maharashtra Industrial Relations Act, 1946 and the Model Standing Orders for Operativ...
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Regional Labour Commissioner's Order Declaring Office Bearers of Unrecognized Union as Protected Workmen Under Section 33(4) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Only Office Bearers of Recognized Union (Federation) Are Entitled to Protected Workmen Status; Deemed Recognition on Expiry of 15 Days Not Contemplated Under Rule 61(4) of Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957.
12 Nov 2024The Petitioner, Tata Communications Limited, challenged an order dated 14 August 2024 passed by the Regional Labour Commissioner (Central), Pune, decl...
- 584
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Union of India in Army Dismissal Case Due to Procedural Irregularity. Summary Court Martial Conducted Without Following Mandatory Procedure Under Army Rules 22-24 and Section 80 of Army Act, 1950 Renders Dismissal Void.
31 Oct 2014The Union of India, Ministry of Defence, and other appellants challenged an order dated 5th September 2001 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Kar...
- 56
