Search Results for "Explanation sale"

3205 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3205 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

“Mandatory Injunction vs Possession: Supreme Court Clarifies Section 41(h) Specific Relief Act (2026 INSC 61)”“Cloud on Title & Possession: Why Injunction Suit Fails

In Sanjay Paliwal v. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., the plaintiffs sought a mandatory injunction to remove a wall allegedly blocking access to their l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Environmental Clearance for Resort Construction in CRZ Area Subject to Conditions — Public Trust Doctrine and Precautionary Principle Applied to Protect Coastal Ecology and Local Livelihoods.

The judgment arises from a Public Interest Litigation and connected writ petitions challenging the environmental clearance granted to M/s. Leading Hot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Injunction Against Defendant in Trademark Infringement Case — 'Cothagiri' Mark Deceptively Similar to 'Cothas'. Court Restrains Defendant from Using Mark 'Cothagiri' for Coffee Products, Finding Prima Facie Case of Passing Off Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The case involves a trademark dispute between M/s. Cothas Coffee Co. (plaintiff/respondent) and M/s. Avighna Coffee Pvt. Ltd. (defendant/appellant). T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'Cothagiri' Mark Deceptively Similar to 'Cothas'. Defendant restrained from using mark 'cothagiri' for coffee products as it is phonetically and structurally similar to plaintiff's registered trademark 'Cothas'.

The case involves a trademark infringement dispute between two coffee companies. The appellant, M/s Avighna Coffee Pvt. Ltd., was the defendant in the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Seller Against Union of India Over Forward Contract Dispute. Contract Held to be a Non-Transferable Specific Delivery Contract under Section 2(f) of Forward Contract (Regulation) Act, 1952, and Thus Not Illegal.

The dispute arose from a contract entered into in September 1960 between appellant Modi & Co. and the respondent Union of India, acting through the Di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Rules that Setting Aside Ex Parte Decree Means Fresh Decree is Decree of First Instance for Pre-emption Rights. Pre-emptor's Right Must Exist on Date of Fresh Decree Under Section 15, Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913.

The case arose from a suit for possession based on the right of pre-emption under the Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913. The appellant, Vijay Singh, a cosh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal Against Decree for Rectification of Partition Deed in Brothers' Property Dispute. The Trial Court had Directed Execution of Rectification Deed and Permanent Injunction, Finding Existence of Joint Family and Error in Site Number.

The appeal arises from a suit for specific performance in the form of rectification of a partition deed and alternative partition, filed by one brothe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Appeal Against Discretionary Order Refusing Interim Injunction in Passing Off Suit — Visual Wrapper Similarity and Ordinary Purchaser Test Examined. Court Examines Whether Emphasis on Dissimilarities Rather Than Similarities Amounted to Error of Principle.

The present appeal arose from a suit for passing off and copyright infringement filed by ITC Limited (plaintiff) against CG Foods (India) Private Limi...