Search Results for "Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Arbitral Tribunal Jurisdiction"

1565 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1565 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Matter, Restores Arbitral Award. Court holds that Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, does not permit reappreciation of evidence or substitution of the arbitrator's view, and the Single Judge exceeded jurisdiction by setting aside the award on merits.

14 Jun 2016

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against a judgment dated 29th July 2015, whereby the learn...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Perversity and Lack of Counterclaim in Contract Dispute. Arbitrator Cannot Award Money in Favour of Non-Appearing Party Without Counterclaim Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

27 Feb 2012

The Union of India filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award passed by a sole arb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Share Transaction Dispute — Limitation Period Governed by Limitation Act, 1963 Pursuant to SEBI Circulars. The court held that SEBI circulars override stock exchange byelaws, and the claim filed within three years under the Limitation Act was not barred.

24 Jul 2013

The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge dismissing a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Terminates Arbitrator Mandate Due to Expiry of Time Limit Under Arbitration Clause — Failure to Complete Arbitration Within Stipulated Period Results in Termination of Arbitrator's Authority. The court held that the mandate of the arbitrator stood terminated under Section 14(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the arbitration was not completed within the time limit prescribed in clause 21 of the agreement.

1 Mar 2012

The petitioner, Teltech Instrumentation Pvt. Ltd., filed an arbitration petition under Section 14(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, se...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Creditor-Bank's Appeal in Insolvency Notice Case — Recovery Certificate Issued by DRT Cannot Form Basis for Insolvency Notice under Section 9(2) of Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909. The Court Holds That Term 'Decree or Order' in Section 9(2) Must Be Strictly Construed to Exclude Recovery Certificates as the Insolvency Act Carries Grave Civil Consequences and Insolvency Notice Is Not a Mode of Execution.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute arose from an attempt by a creditor-bank to initiate insolvency proceedings against a guarantor director based on a recovery certificate i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Declaration and Injunction in Share Dispute Due to Limitation and Lack of Urgency. Plaintiff's claim for declaration of share ownership and rectification of register barred by limitation under Article 58 of Limitation Act, 1963 as cause of action arose in 1998 but suit filed in 2008.

16 Mar 2017

The plaintiff, Messer Holdings Limited, a company incorporated in British Virgin Islands, filed a suit in 2008 seeking a declaration that it is the ow...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Dealership Dispute — Holds Arbitrator Exceeded Jurisdiction by Awarding Damages Without Proper Evidence. The court found that the respondent's failure to collect goods caused the loss, and termination for supplying spurious goods was valid under the dealership agreement.

7 Feb 2019

The case involves cross arbitration petitions challenging an arbitral award arising from a dealership agreement between NOD Bearings Pvt. Ltd. (petiti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Appointment Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Court holds that review jurisdiction under Section 114 CPC is limited to errors apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used to re-argue the merits of the case.

10 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Sayla Realtors, filed a review petition before the Bombay High Court seeking review of an order dated September 25, 2025. By that orde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows MTNL's Challenge to Arbitral Award in False Ceiling Contract Dispute. Court Upholds Award on Certain Claims but Sets Aside Award on Claim for Price Escalation Due to Lack of Evidence and Contrary to Contract Terms.

13 Feb 2015

The petitioner, Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (MTNL), challenged an arbitral award dated 29 March 2011 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concil...

High Court

High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Commercial Court Order on Arbitration Time Extension Application. Commercial Court Erred in Declining Jurisdiction Over Section 29A Application Based on Arbitrator Appointment Method Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

12 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 22.08.2025 passed by t...

108 109 110 111 112

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)