Search Results for "vacate injunction"

419 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 419 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals Against Interim Injunction in Property Suit — Balance of Convenience Favors Plaintiff. The court upheld the trial court's order granting interim injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC, finding no perversity in the exercise of discretion.

The case involves four miscellaneous first appeals filed by the appellants, Mohamed Umar Seeni Ariff Khan and Mrs. Mumtaj Seeni Ariff Khan, against th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions by Non-Signatories Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act. Third Parties Cannot Appeal Interim Arbitral Orders Absent Privity of Arbitration Agreement.

The dispute arose from arbitration proceedings between Excel Metal Processors Pvt. Ltd. (respondent no.1) and Shakti International Private Limited (re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Second Appeal, Upholds Tenant's Right to New Premises Despite Demolition of Old Shop. Tenancy Rights Were Held Not to Be Terminated by Demolition, and Doctrine of Frustration Under Section 56 of Indian Contract Act Was Inapplicable.

This second appeal arose from a civil suit filed by the respondent-plaintiff, a tenant in a shop block owned by the appellant-landlord. The parties ha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Trial Court Judgment for Lack of Reasons in Declaration and Injunction Suit — Remands for Fresh Disposal. Court finds that the Trial Court failed to discuss evidence or assign reasons on issues framed, rendering the judgment unsustainable under Order 20 Rule 4(2) CPC.

The appellant, who was the defendant in the original suit, challenged the judgment and decree dated 23 June 2014 passed by the XLIII Additional City C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Possession Suit — Licensee Status Upheld. Brother-in-law held to be gratuitous licensee, not co-owner, as plaintiff proved self-acquisition of property under Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

The case involves a dispute between Sujata Ashok Moon (plaintiff/respondent) and Rajendra Parasramji Moon (defendant/appellant) over possession of a t...