Search Results for "unsatisfactory explanation"

312 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 312 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes FIR Against Retired Nazir in Judgment Paper Shortage Case — Lack of Criminal Intent and Civil Nature of Dispute. Shortage of 90 packets of judgment paper attributed to administrative lapses, not criminal breach of trust under Sections 403 and 409 IPC.

The present application was filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by Amit Ravichandrabhai Rawal, the applicant, who was the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Notice Under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 — Non-Speaking Final Notice Held Valid as No Adjudication Required at Section 6 Stage. Petitioners Failed to Exhaust Statutory Appeal Remedy Under Section 10 of the Act.

The petitioners, Karupayee and Thangamani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Husband in Dowry Death Case Due to Procedural Irregularities and Lack of Evidence. Two trials on same FIR, clubbing and de-tagging, led to conviction of only one accused despite no evidence against others.

The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed by Brajesh Kumar @ Birjesh Kumar Singh, the husband of a woman who succumbed to burn injuries in her matr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Non-Application of Mind and Unexplained Delay. Failure to Consider Retraction of Statement and Delay of Over 11 Months in Passing Order Vitiate Subjective Satisfaction Under Section 3(1)(i) of COFEPOSA Act, 1976.

The petitioner, Gaurav Kanak Jain, challenged a detention order dated 21st November 2016 passed under Section 3(1)(i) of the Conservation of Foreign E...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Criminal Appeals Against Conviction for Kidnapping, Gang Rape, and Murder of a 3½-Year-Old Girl. Trial Court Convicted Under Sections 363, 366, 377, 302, 201 Read with 34 IPC Based on Circumstantial Evidence.

The Bombay High Court heard criminal appeals filed by four accused/appellants against their conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bomba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Abetment to Suicide. Conviction under Sections 306 and 498A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove cruelty or instigation leading to suicide.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of three appellants (husband, father-in-law, and mother-in-law of the deceased) under Sections 306 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Termination of Probationary Employees in MSETCL — Probation Period Extended Validly Under Service Rules. Termination of Probationer Without Stigma Upheld as Employer's Discretion Under Regulation 11 of MSETCL Service Regulations.

The petitioners, Chandrashekhar Tukarampant Madankar, Anup Udhav Lokhande, and Harshal Radheshyam Malewar, were appointed as Junior Engineers (Electri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act Due to Non-Supply of Incriminating Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) Violated as Statements of Co-Accused and Call Data Records Not Furnished.

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Vilas Vithal Ambokar, challenged a preventive detention order dated 10th April 2015 passed by the Principal Secreta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Termination of Probationary Employees in MSETCL — Termination During Probation Valid Without Stigma or Mala Fides. Probationer has no right to the post and termination simpliciter during probation does not attract principles of natural justice.

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by probationary employees of the Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Company Ltd (MSETCL) chal...