Search Results for "union rivalry"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "union rivalry"

115 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 115 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Acquitted Accused's Writ Petition for Rs.200 Crore Compensation as Acquittal Does Not Automatic Entitlement. The Court Holds That Compensation Under Article 226 Requires Proof of Malicious Prosecution and Violation of Fundamental Rights, Not Mere Acquittal.

5 May 2017

The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was filed by the peti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Remission for Life Convicts in Murder Case: Petitioners Re-categorized from Category 5(b) to 3(b) Under 2010 Remission Policy. The court held that the motive of political rivalry was not established for all petitioners and the incident occurred without premeditation, thus they should be placed in Category 3(b) (22 years) rather than Category 5(b) (26 years) under the 2010 Remission Policy.

28 Feb 2024

The petitioners, Ankush Bharat Gaikwad and Yuvraj Bharat Gaikwad, were convicted for murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. They had undergone mor...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Remission for Life Convicts in Murder Case Based on Beneficial Interpretation of Remission Policy. The court held that the petitioners, convicted for murder, should be placed in category 3(b) (22 years) rather than category 5(b) (26 years) of the 2010 remission guidelines as the motive of political rivalry was not established for all accused.

28 Feb 2024

The petitioners, Ankush Bharat Gaikwad and Yuvraj Bharat Gaikwad, were convicted for murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. They had undergone mor...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeals Against Acquittal in Sohrabuddin Fake Encounter Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Hostile Witnesses. Acquittal Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Establish Police-Politician Conspiracy and Connection to Seized Firearms Under Sections 120B, 302 IPC and Section 378 CrPC.

7 May 2026

The appeals arose from the judgment of acquittal dated 21 December 2018 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai, in Sessions Case Nos. 177 of 2013, 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Reconsideration of Premature Release for Life Convict Under Government Resolution Guidelines. Classification of Convict Under Clause 4 of Annexure-I to Government Resolution Dated 15th March 2010 Must Be Based on Findings in Judgment of Conviction.

4 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Shri Vitthal Pundalik Zendge, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai on 8th June 1999 for offences under Secti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Filed by Convicts in Akshardham Temple Terror Attack Case. Appeals Challenge Convictions Under POTA, IPC, Arms Act, and Explosive Substances Act for Conspiracy and Murder of 33 Persons.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court of India heard criminal appeals filed by the convicted accused-appellants challenging their conviction and sentences awarded by the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Premature Release of Life Convict in Rape and Murder Case - Guidelines of 2010 Applied Instead of 1992 Guidelines. The Court directed reconsideration under the 2010 Revised Guidelines for premature release of life convicts, rejecting the State's application of 1992 Guidelines requiring 26 years imprisonment.

24 Jun 2013

The petitioner, Devanand Laxmanrao Jamnik, a life convict serving sentence in Open Prison, Morshi, filed a Criminal Writ Petition challenging the orde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Orders Under MPDA Act for Failure to Consider Less Drastic Alternatives — Detenues Already in Judicial Custody at Time of Order. Preventive detention order invalid as detaining authority did not consider possibility of bail or less drastic measures despite detenues being in judicial custody.

7 Jul 2006

The Bombay High Court disposed of two criminal writ petitions challenging detention orders dated 30th June 2005 passed under Section 3(1) of the Mahar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Parricide Case Due to Lack of Intent and Sudden Provocation. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as the fatal blow was struck during a sudden altercation without premeditation, reducing offence to culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

9 Aug 2010

The appellant, Hasan Geblya Padvi, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nandurbar, for the murder of his father, Geblya Rava Padvi, under S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Medical Practitioner for Violations Under Pre-Conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques Act, 1994 — Failure to Maintain Records and Submit False Nil Reports. The court held that the owner of a genetic clinic is vicariously liable for non-maintenance of prescribed records and submission of false returns, even if the sonologist was separately permitted.

25 Sep 2023

The petitioner, Dr. Tukaram Karde, a BHMS medical practitioner and owner of Bhagwant Hospital and Genetic Clinic in Washi, was convicted under Section...

9 10 11 12

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)