Search Results for "truck driver negligence"

533 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 533 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — 10% Contributory Negligence Set Aside and Compensation Enhanced. Rear-end collision by truck held solely negligent; multiplier of 17 applied with 40% future prospects for self-employed deceased aged 30.

The present appeal arises out of a judgment and award dated 01.12.2012 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ahmedabad in MACP No.1145 of 2005...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Western Coalfields Limited in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence. Jeep Owner Not Liable for Full Compensation as Deceased Employee's Negligence Contributed to Accident.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 13 August 2004, when Sandeep Gupta, an employee of Western Coalfields Limited (WCL), was drivin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Corrected Multiplier and Consortium Award. Negligence Apportioned Between Rickshaw and Truck Drivers Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the legal heirs of Shaileshbhai Vinodrai Mevada, who died in a vehicular accident on 27....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence Attribution and Quantum of Compensation under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The court held the truck driver solely negligent and enhanced compensation from Rs.8,00,960 to Rs.12,00,000 for the death of a 35-year-old tailor.

The present appeal arises from the impugned judgment and award dated 07.09.2013 passed by the Motor Accident Claims (Aux.) Tribunal at Surat in Motor ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Sets Aside MACT Dismissal for Failure to Prove Negligence. Claimant's evidence of rash driving by respondent motorcyclist found sufficient to establish negligence under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Mr. Sameer S. Desai, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Appeal by State in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Driver Proved, No Contributory Negligence by Deceased. Employer's Vicarious Liability Upheld Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the respondents (original claimants) under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Truck Driver Convicted for Rash and Negligent Driving Causing Death of a Minor. Concurrent findings of fact on identity of driver and rashness upheld; no interference warranted.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal of Subhash Chand, who was convicted under Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304-A (causing death by negligence) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence and Income Assessment Upheld. Tribunal's Award of Rs. 88,46,000/- with 12% Interest Confirmed as Based on Evidence.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the respondents (claimants) being the wife, daughter, and mother of the deceased Dilip M...