Search Results for "travelling allowance"

152 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 152 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders in Unfair Labour Practice Complaints. Summary jurisdiction under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act does not bar determination of disputed employer-employee relationship when status is prima facie established.

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by Birla Cotsyn (India) Ltd., the employer, challenging identical orders passed by the Labour Court a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Disciplinary Order for Recovery of Rs. 2398.80 Due to Violation of Natural Justice and Disciplinary Rules

The petitioner, a junior engineer with  Respondent, challenged a disciplinary order dated 14/05/2019 imposing recovery of Rs. 2398.80 for alleged...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Service Matter - MNP Workers Not Entitled to Regularisation. Government Scheme for Village Level Workers Was Temporary and Not a Regular Employment Scheme, Hence No Right to Absorption.

The State of Tamil Nadu appealed against a Division Bench judgment of the Madras High Court which affirmed a Single Judge order directing the State to...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Denial of Deemed Promotion Due to Censure Penalty. Censure is a minor penalty and cannot be the sole ground to deny deemed date of promotion when juniors were promoted earlier.

The petitioner, Shah Tejaskumar Vinodchandra, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Gujarat High...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Validity of Karnataka Parliamentary Secretaries Allowances Act, 1963 and Appointment of Parliamentary Secretaries. The Court held that the Act is within legislative competence and appointments are valid under Article 164(1-A) of the Constitution.

The judgment pertains to two Public Interest Litigation (PIL) petitions filed before the Karnataka High Court challenging the constitutional validity ...