Search Results for "summons case procedure"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "summons case procedure"

2698 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2698 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Chamber Summons to Raise Attachment Under Order 21 Rule 54 CPC — Bona Fide Purchaser for Value Without Notice of Decree Protected. The court held that an attachment order served after the purchaser had paid full consideration and obtained possession is not binding on the purchaser.

6 Apr 2005

The present chamber summons was taken out by the applicant, Rajneesh Agarwal & Associates P. Ltd, seeking to raise an attachment under Order 21 Rule 5...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Writ Petition Against Compulsory Retirement of Former Civil Judge; Alternative Remedy Not Exhausted But Court Proceeds to Hear Merits. Dispute concerns whether judicial officer's grant of bail in non-bailable offenses after rejection by Sessions Court and procedural irregularities under CrPC constitute misconduct warranting compulsory retirement.

26 Jul 2005

The petitioner, a former Joint Civil Judge (Junior Division) and Judicial Magistrate, filed a writ petition under Article 226 before the Bombay High C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Probate Case, Upholds Setting Aside of Ex Parte Decree Dismissing Caveat Due to Non-Service of Citation. The court held that the son of the testator was not served with citation, and the ex parte decree was rightly set aside subject to payment of costs.

12 Jan 2010

The appellant, R.V. Bhasin, filed a probate petition (Petition No. 4 of 2003) in the Bombay High Court seeking probate of the Will and Codicil of his ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Condonation of Delay in Filing Caveat in Probate Proceedings — Delay of 140 Days Not Sufficiently Explained. Court Held That Awareness of Proceedings and Legal Advice Negated Claim of Ignorance, and Delay Was Not Condoned Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

17 Feb 2014

The judgment concerns a Chamber Summons filed by the applicants (caveators) seeking condonation of a 140-day delay in filing a caveat and affidavit in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioners to Obtain Commission to Singapore Under Section 27 of Arbitration Act. Issuing Commission to Foreign Country Does Not Amount to Change of Venue of Arbitration.

8 Jun 2018

The petition was filed under section 27 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by the two petitioners, who were the original respondents in the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Amendment Application - Article 137 of Limitation Act Does Not Apply to Amendment of Pleadings Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC. The court held that the right to apply for amendment arises when the need is discovered, not on filing of written statement, and allowed the amendment to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.

27 Feb 2013

The appeal arose from an order of the Learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing a Chamber Summons for amendment of the written statemen...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Sets Aside Exparte Divorce Decree Due to Non-Compliance with Summons Service Rules. Family Court Failed to Require Affidavit of Bailiff or Examine Him as Mandated by Rule 19 of Family Court Rules, 1988 and Order V Rules 17, 19 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

10 Jul 2018

This is an appeal filed by the husband against an exparte decree of dissolution of marriage granted by the Family Court, Aurangabad on the grounds of ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Quashing of Cheque Dishonour Complaint for Procedural Irregularities. Taking Cognizance After Recording Sworn Statement and Validity of Power of Attorney Holder's Complaint Examined Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

4 Jul 2022

The High Court of Karnataka heard writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking quashing of criminal proceedings in ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Dispute Case — Holds Magistrate Can Order Further Investigation Post-Cognizance Under Section 173(8) CrPC. The Court clarified that the power to order further investigation is not extinguished by filing of charge-sheet or taking of cognizance, and can be exercised before commencement of trial.

16 Oct 2019

The case arises from an FIR lodged on 22.12.2009 by Nitinbhai Mangubhai Patel, Power-of-Attorney holder of Ramanbhai Bhagubhai Patel and Shankarbhai B...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Compensation Claim in GST Arrest Case -- Petitioner's Allegations of Illegal Detention Rejected -- Proper Procedure Followed Under CGST Act

5 Feb 2026

The petitioner, filed a criminal writ petition seeking compensation of Rs. 10,00,000/- for alleged illegal arrest and detention by GST authorities -- ...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)