Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Challenge to Compromise Decree in Suit for Specific Performance — Compromise Not Binding as Plaintiff's Advocate Had No Authority to Enter into Compromise Without Express Consent. The court held that an advocate's implied authority does not extend to compromising a suit without the client's express consent, and the trial court erred in rejecting the plaintiff's application under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC.
20 Jun 2016The petitioner, Ashok Babulal Agrawal, was the original plaintiff in Special Civil Suit No. 29 of 2011 filed in the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Divis...




