Not mentioned (judgment text incomplete; final verdict not provided)
10 Nov 2023The writ petition filed before the Bombay High Court challenged the order dated 5 October 2021 passed by the District Deputy Registrar (Cooperative So...
Search Results for "slum notification"
215 result(s) found
Found 215 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Restrains Developers from Constructing Additional Buildings in Multi-Building Scheme Without Flat Owners' Consent Under MOFA. Disclosure of Potential Additional Construction Held Insufficient Where Specific Representations Were Made About FSI Utilisation and Layout.
22 Jan 2015The dispute centered on a 230-acre development known as the Powai Area Development Scheme (PADS), in which several cooperative housing societies of co...
- 19
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Construction Under MHADA Act — Petitioners Failed to Establish Legal Right Over Encroached Land. The court held that the respondents acted within their powers under the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976, and the petitioners were not entitled to any relief.
30 Nov -0001The petitioners, M/s Twin & Deccan Builders and others, filed two writ petitions challenging the demolition of structures on land at Andheri, Mumbai, ...
- 142
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA's 10-Year Transfer Ban on Rehab Tenements as Unconstitutional and Ultra Vires. Condition in NOC restricting sale/transfer of tenancy rights for ten years from occupation held to be without statutory authority and violative of Article 300A of the Constitution.
7 Jul 2015The Bombay High Court dealt with two writ petitions challenging a condition imposed by the Mumbai Building Repairs & Reconstruction Board (a unit of M...
- 559
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction on Communidade Land in Ribandar-Chimbel Area — Holds That Petitioners Failed to Establish Encroachment on Public Property or Violation of CRZ Norms. The court found that the petitioner society lacked locus standi and the construction permissions were validly granted.
16 Jun 2023The judgment pertains to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Ribandar Chimbel Rakhon Samiti, a registered society, challenging construction ac...
- 78
High Court
WRIT PETITION NO.3013 OF 2018
27 Feb 2019The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by a co-operative housing society, a developer, and its director challenging a stop ...
- 10
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Urban Land Ceiling Case Due to Valid Possession and Exclusion of Civil Court Jurisdiction. Possession Taken via Panchnama Before Repeal Act, 1999 Validates State's Ownership Under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, Sections 10(1) and 10(3), Rendering Civil Suit for Declaration Non-Maintainable.
22 Nov 2021The dispute involved agricultural land in Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, originally owned by late Padam Singh, who filed a declaration under the Urban Land (...
- 240
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL as Abuse of Process, Imposes Costs for Misusing Public Interest Litigation Jurisdiction to Serve Vested Interests. The Court found that the petitioner, under the guise of environmental protection, sought demolition of a Koli community crematorium on Erangal Beach, Malad, which was already achieved by the time of hearing, and the petition was motivated by extraneous considerations.
29 Sep 2022The Bombay High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Chetan Kodarlal Vyas, finding it to be an abuse of the PIL jurisdiction. T...
- 63
High Court
Madras High Court Delivers Common Order on Civil Revision Petitions Against Eviction Under Tamil Nadu Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1975. The revision petitioners contested the applicability of the Act to their permanently leased government-grant property and the validity of the eviction proceedings initiated by the Estate Officer.
10 Apr 2026The revision petitions arose from eviction proceedings under the Tamil Nadu Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1975. The revisi...
- 22
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Rehabilitation of Displaced Person. Acquisition under Section 4 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for rehabilitation of respondent no. 4 upheld as valid and not vitiated by malafides.
5 Mar 2014The petitioners, claiming to be shareholders of the Communidade of Betalbatim (respondent no. 3), filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of...
- 100
