Search Results for "sham and bogus contract"

113 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 113 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance Due to Non-Compliance with Order VI Rule 17 CPC and Lack of Pleading Readiness and Willingness. Plaintiff failed to amend plaint to incorporate essential facts regarding readiness and willingness to perform contract, leading to dismissal of suit.

The plaintiff, Neeta Sawant, filed a suit for specific performance of an Agreement for Sale dated 30th September 2016, by which the defendants agreed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property.

The appellants (original plaintiffs) filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction in respect of suit property bearing R.S. No. 165/2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Applications in Rent Control Dispute — Licence vs. Lease Determination. Court upholds findings that agreement was a lease under Transfer of Property Act, not a licence, and that tenant sublet premises without consent, violating Bombay Rent Act.

The case involves two Civil Revision Applications filed by Messrs Miscellenary Marketers Pvt. Ltd. (defendants) against Messrs SunNSand Pvt. Ltd. (pla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Applications in Rent Control Dispute — Licence vs. Lease Determination Under Bombay Rent Act, 1947. Agreement for use of shop premises held to be a lease, not a licence, based on exclusive possession and intention of parties.

The case involves two Civil Revision Applications filed by Messrs Miscellenary Marketers Pvt. Ltd. (defendants) against Messrs SunNSand Pvt. Ltd. (pla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Decree for Want of Written Statement in Specific Performance Suit. Failure to File Written Statement Despite Repeated Opportunities Justifies Decree Under Order 8 Rule 5(2) and Rule 10 CPC.

The case arises from a suit filed by the respondent (original plaintiff) against the appellants (original defendants) seeking specific performance of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Section 9 Application in Arbitration Dispute Over Television Serial Marketing Rights. Right of First Refusal Protected Pending Arbitration Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, UTV Software Communications Ltd., entered into an agreement with the respondent, Radaan Media Works Ltd., on 21 June 2001, under which ...