KAHC010023912010_1
11 Jul 2014...
Search Results for "section 29(1)"
551 result(s) found
Found 551 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application of Lessor in Rent Control Exclusion Case. Company That Lost Rent Control Protection Due to High Paid-Up Share Capital Cannot Regain It by Subsequent Reduction.
4 Oct 2024The case involves a dispute between M/s. Depe Global Shipping Agencies Pvt. Ltd. (Plaintiff/Lessor) and M/s. Mather and Platt (India) Ltd. (Defendant/...
- 647
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes 'C' Summary Report in Forgery Case — Directs Further Investigation Under Section 173(8) CrPC. Court holds that acceptance of summary report without considering FIR allegations and without examining witnesses vitiates the order, and that the informant has locus standi to challenge such acceptance.
16 Jan 2020The petitioner, Avneesh Harvansh Singh, is the first informant who lodged an FIR on 22 September 2015 against respondent nos.2 to 6, who are co-truste...
- 82
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals in SAFEMA Forfeiture Case — Notice to Convict Not Mandatory When Property Held by Relatives. The Court held that proceedings against relatives under Section 6 of SAFEMA are independent and do not require prior notice to the convict.
14 Dec 2021The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against a Madras High Court judgment that had set aside forfeiture orders under the Smugglers and Foreign Exc...
- 221
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Patent Infringement Suit — Director's Authority to Sue Not Barred by Absence of Board Resolution at Plaint Stage. The court held that Order 29 Rule 1 CPC allows a director to sign and verify pleadings, and the absence of a board resolution is not a ground for rejection under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC.
2 Sep 2014The appellant, M/s. Alcon Electronics Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against the respondent, Celem S.A., in the District Court at Nashik seeking a declaratio...
- 178
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Validates Sub-Classification of Scheduled Castes in Landmark Judgment. Upholding Equality Within Equality: Supreme Court Endorses State's Power to Sub-Classify Scheduled Castes for Targeted Reservation.
1 Aug 2024The Supreme Court of India, in a significant ruling, has upheld the constitutionality of sub-classifying Scheduled Castes for the purpose of reservati...
- 489
High Court
KAHC010479002008_1
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a consolidated batch of writ petitions filed by various entities including National Mineral Development ...
- 30
High Court
High Court Allows Petition to Register FIR Against Police Officer for Illegal Arrest and Assault in Land Dispute. Arrest for Offences Under Sections 447, 379 IPC Without Compliance of Section 41A CrPC Held Violative of Personal Liberty, Compensation Directed.
19 Jan 2023The case arose from a land dispute between neighbors that escalated into allegations of police brutality. The petitioner, a 23-year-old advocate, owne...
- 22
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 — Multiple Mining Companies Challenge the Levy as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws.
3 Dec 2015The matter involved a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry assoc...
- 34
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against DIC and Sales Tax Department for Refusing Transfer of Property Purchased in SARFAESI Auction — Auction Purchaser Not Liable for Previous Owner's Sales Tax Dues. The court held that the auction purchaser under the SARFAESI Act acquires clear title free from prior encumbrances, and the DIC cannot insist on NOC from Sales Tax for transfer of property.
18 Feb 2021The petitioner, Medineutrina Pvt. Ltd., purchased an immovable property (plot no.206, MIDC, Butibori, Nagpur) in an auction conducted by Punjab Nation...
- 26
