Search Results for "reopening assessment"

438 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 438 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice for Lack of Jurisdiction and Limitation — Income Tax Act, 1961 Sections 147, 148, 148A, 149, 151. Reassessment notice issued beyond limitation period and without fresh information under Explanation 1 to Section 148 is invalid.

The petitioner, Godrej Industries Ltd., challenged a show cause notice dated 24th May 2022 under Section 148A(b), an order dated 31st July 2022 under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Based on Same Material as Original Assessment is Invalid as Change of Opinion.

The petitioner, Geopreneur Realty Private Limited, a real estate development company, challenged a notice dated 30 March 2021 issued under Section 148...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reopening of Assessment Beyond Four Years Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — No Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reopening Based on Change of Opinion Not Permissible; Notice Under Section 148 Quashed.

The petitioner, Hasmukh Estates Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956/2013, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 of Income-Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Reasonable Belief of Income Escaping Assessment. Notices Issued Beyond Four Years Without Fresh Material Held Invalid.

The petitioner, Sea Sagar Construction Co., a partnership firm, filed three writ petitions challenging notices dated 19 January 2012 issued under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Reassessment Case — Reopening Based on Change of Opinion Invalid. ITAT Correctly Held That Reassessment Under Section 147 Was Not Justified as There Was No Failure to Disclose Material Facts.

The case involves a tax appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which upheld the cancel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Income Tax Reassessment Case — Mushroom Farming Income Held Agricultural. Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Quashed as Based on Change of Opinion.

The petitioner, Zuari Foods and Farms Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company engaged in mushroom farming, filed its income tax return for assessment yea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income-tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment Based on Change of Opinion on Commission Payment to Directors Held Invalid as All Issues Were Examined During Original Assessment.

The Petitioner, M/s. Dalal & Broacha Stock Broking Pvt. Ltd., a stock broking company, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2008-09 declarin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices for HUF Assessee in Income Tax Case — Lack of Reasonable Belief of Income Escaping Assessment. Notices under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 set aside as reasons for reopening were based on mere change of opinion and not on fresh tangible material.

The petitioner, a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) carrying on cotton ginning and pressing business, challenged four notices dated 30 March 2004 issued un...