Search Results for "rehabilitation plot"

351 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 351 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows De-Sealing of Commercial Premises in PIL Based on Judicial Committee Order. Applicant's Premises Ordered to be De-Sealed Subject to Compliance with Common Order Dated 18.12.2023.

The present application (I.A. No.203615 of 2024) was filed by an individual applicant seeking de-sealing of his commercial premises located at plot No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Condemns Demolition by Municipal Corporation Under Guise of DCPR 2034 Redevelopment Scheme. Appeal from Order Dismisses Demolition as High-handed and Illegal Under Regulation 33(9) of Development Control and Promotion Regulation 2034.

The matter pertains to an appeal from order filed by M/s. Mehta & Co., a partnership firm through its partner Mr. Adarsh Varma, as original plaintiff,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes AGRC Order in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute — Consent Terms Binding on Successor Developer. Petitioners' Entitlement to Two Shops of 409 Sq Ft Each Upheld Based on Consent Terms in Suit No.1994 of 2008.

The petitioners, Alphonso D'Souza and Vanessa D'Souza, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 5th January 2022 passed by the Apex Grievances...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Development Rights Certificate in Land Reservation Case. Held That Landowner Entitled to DRC for Entire Reserved Area Under Section 126(1)(c) of MRTP Act, 1966.

The appellants, Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited and its constituted attorney, owned land bearing CTS No. 2B (part) and 3B in Mumbai, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Disability Certificate Issued by Medical Board in BEST Employee Case. The Court held that the employer cannot challenge the disability certificate without independent evidence, and the writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 is not maintainable.

The petitioner, Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply and Transport Undertaking (BEST), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition and Quashes CIDCO Stop-Work Notice in 12.5% Scheme Plot Dispute. Petitioner's Title from Original Owner Upheld Over Trust Claim Under Section 11 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioner, Deepak Valji Karia and M/s. Ambedeep Enterprises, challenged a stop-work notice dated 6 May 2016 issued by CIDCO (Respondent Nos. 2-4)...