Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Involving Cooperative Housing Societies and Developer Over MOFA Compliance. Pleadings Involve Section 5A of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 and Role of District Deputy Registrar.
9 May 2025...
Search Results for "recreational area"
170 result(s) found
Found 170 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows HUDA's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Section 5A Compliance Upheld. Collector's recommendation not binding on State Government; no discrimination found in acquisition of land for development.
18 Oct 2024The case involves appeals by Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) against the High Court's judgment quashing land acquisition notifications unde...
- 811
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Demolition of Residential Structures Without Notice in NMM Kamgar Cooperative Housing Society. Court holds that demolition of structures without prior notice under Section 53 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 is illegal and violative of natural justice.
7 Jul 2023The petitioners, residents of NMM Kamgar Cooperative Housing Society in Thane, filed a writ petition challenging the demolition of their residential s...
- 53
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition of Houses Without Notice Under Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976. Demolition of dwelling houses without prior notice and hearing held illegal and violative of principles of natural justice.
20 Mar 2023The petitioners, residents of Chandramavinakoppalu, Sagar Taluk, Shimoga District, filed a writ petition challenging the demolition of their houses by...
- 152
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Apartmentalisation in Chandigarh Residential Plots to Preserve City's Original Character. Fragmentation of single dwelling units into multiple apartments violates Rule 16 of Chandigarh Estate Rules, 2007 and the Chandigarh Master Plan 2031.
10 Jan 2023The case involves a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Chandigarh Citizens Forum (appellants) against the Chandigarh Administration and others, s...
- 321
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Disposes PIL Seeking Implementation of Earlier Directions on Demarcation of High Tide Line and CRZ Compliance for Beachfront Hotel. Court Holds That Authorities Must Determine if Construction Falls Within Prohibited Zone Under CRZ Notification, 1991.
24 Aug 2018The Goa Foundation, a public interest organization, filed PIL Writ Petition No. 26 of 2017 before the High Court of Bombay at Goa, alleging that the G...
- 16
High Court
Full Bench of Bombay High Court Considers Whether Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act Lapses Acquisitions Under MRTP Act — Reference to Determine Interplay Between Central and State Land Acquisition Laws. The core issue was whether acquisition proceedings initiated under Sections 125-127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 fall within the lapsing provision of the 2013 Central Act.
13 Oct 2017The matter before the Full Bench of the Bombay High Court arose from three writ petitions filed by landowners whose lands were acquired under the prov...
- 13
High Court
Karnataka High Court Issues Directions to BBMP to Demolish Illegal Construction by Adjoining Landowner for Gross Violation of Building Bye-Laws. BBMP Officials Found to Have Failed in Statutory Duty to Inspect and Enforce Commencement Certificate Requirement Under Bangalore Mahanagara Palike Building Byelaws 2003 and Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act, 1976.
19 Nov 2014Background: The petition was filed by the owner of property No.8/2, adjacent to respondents 4 and 5's property No.8/1 in Bangalore. The petitioner all...
- 61
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 37(1AA) of MRTP Act in Constitutional Validity Case. Court Holds That State's Power to Modify Development Plans Does Not Violate 74th Amendment or Article 243W.
17 Oct 2005The petitioners, residents of Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitutional validity of Section 3...
- 48
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Development Charge Levy in Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act. The court held that the levy is a fee for services rendered and not a tax, and the amendment is within legislative competence.
13 Jun 2005The petitioners, The Solapur Promoters and Builders Association Society and another, challenged the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Regiona...
- 140
