Search Results for "recovery impermissible"

673 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 673 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence — Conviction Set Aside Due to Gaps in Chain of Circumstances. Failure to Prove Motive and Last Seen Theory Beyond Reasonable Doubt Leads to Benefit of Doubt Under Indian Penal Code, 1860 Sections 302, 201, 120B.

The appellant, Vrishal Madhukar Kalane, was convicted by the trial court under Sections 302, 201, and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for the mur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in SC/ST Act Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Caste Insult. Conviction under Sections 302, 341, 294(b), 506(ii) IPC r/w SC/ST Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove caste-based motive and murder beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves an appeal by Rajesh, Mahadevan, and Anand (Accused Nos.1, 2, and 6) against their conviction and sentence by the I Additional and Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Dacoity Case Due to Lack of Identification and Flawed Circumstantial Evidence. High Court's Reversal of Acquittal Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Identity and Circumstantial Evidence Was Unreliable Under Section 397 IPC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Nagaraja (Accused No.4) against the judgment of the Karnataka High Court which had reversed his acquittal and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Railway's Petition Challenging CAT Order on Pay Refixation. Repatriated Employee Entitled to Same Pay Scale as Enjoyed in Ex-Cadre Post, Refixation Set Aside.

The Union of India and railway authorities (petitioners) challenged an order dated 28.11.2017 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Bengaluru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds DRAT Order Allowing One Time Settlement in Debt Recovery Case — Interest Must Be Calculated as Per OTS Terms. The court held that the DRT erred in not giving effect to the OTS and in calculating interest beyond the OTS terms, and the DRAT correctly set aside the DRT order.

The petitioners, Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI) and India SME Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd., challenged an order dated 26th Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pensioner's Writ Petition for Fixation of Pay Scale and Pensionary Benefits in Education Service — Held that Petitioner is Entitled to Pay Scale of Trained Graduate Teacher and Pensionary Benefits from Date of Initial Appointment.

The petitioner, Walmik Sitaram Sirsath, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher in the Government D.Ed. College, Neknoor, on 1.12.1984. He possessed a B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Borrower's Challenge to DRAT Order in SARFAESI Act Possession Dispute — Possession Notice Valid but Sale Notice Invalid. Bank Permitted to Proceed from Stage of Rule 8(5) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002.

The petitioners, M/s. Clarity Gold Pvt. Ltd. (borrower) and Mrs. Ganga Devi Gupta (guarantor and mortgagor), challenged an order of the Debts Recovery...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Acquittal of Accused Under Section 302 IPC Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 30th September 1989 passed by the IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur in S...