Search Results for "recovery after retirement"

546 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 546 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by KPTCL Against Order Directing Disbursement of Pension to Retired Employee. Withholding of Pension Without Disciplinary Proceedings or Pension Rules is Arbitrary and Unjustified.

The case involves a retired employee of Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited (KPTCL) who superannuated on 31.05.2022. The Corporation with...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employee's Petition Against Pension Refixation by Pune Municipal Corporation. Court holds that pension cannot be reduced without affording opportunity of hearing and that fixation of pay at time of promotion cannot be reopened after retirement.

The petitioner, Shri Shrikant Chintaman Joshi, was a retired employee of the Pune Municipal Corporation. He was appointed as an Overseer on 8th July 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows EPF Recovery Over Bank's Mortgage in Priority Dispute Under Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. EPF Dues Have Priority Over Secured Creditors Under Section 11 of EPF Act, 1952.

The case involves three writ appeals arising from orders of a learned Single Judge in W.P.Nos.15582 of 2010 and 8686 of 2010 dated 21.06.2011. The app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Retired Teachers Challenging Recovery Orders for Violation of Natural Justice. Impugned orders directing recovery of alleged excess payments from pensioners quashed for lack of notice and opportunity of hearing.

The petitioners, fourteen retired teachers, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging orders dated 27.08.2014 passed by the respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Employees' Right to Gratuity in Pending Criminal Appeals Under Kerala Service Rules. Interpretation of Rules 3 and 3A of Kerala Service Rules Distinguishes Pension from Death-cum-Retirement Gratuity, Prohibiting Withholding Despite Conviction with Suspended Sentence.

The Supreme Court examined appeals arising from a Full Bench judgment of the Kerala High Court concerning the entitlement of government employees to D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Bank Manager for Misconduct in Loan Sanctions. Disciplinary Proceedings Valid as Charges of Failing to Exercise Due Diligence and Integrity in Sanctioning Loans Were Established, and Penalty Not Disproportionate.

The petitioner, R.M. Yadav, was a Branch Manager at Bank of India's Agardanda branch. In 2003, disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Recovery of Excess Pay in Ordnance Factory Case. Recovery of Excess Amount Paid Due to Employer's Mistake Held Impermissible When Employees Are in Same or Higher Pay Scale and No Misrepresentation Is Involved.

The petitioners, employees of Ordnance Factory Bhandara, were granted a higher pay scale by the employer. Subsequently, the employer sought to recover...