Search Results for "private defense"

437 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 437 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Wild Elephant Electrocution Case Due to Lack of Evidence Linking Accused to Electrified Fencing. Conviction under Wild Life Protection Act, Indian Electricity Act, and IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Ownership or Authorization of Unauthorized Power Connection.

The appellant, Shivappa, was convicted by the District and Sessions Judge, Chamarajanagar, in Spl. Case No.140/2009 for offences under Sections 39 and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010115872016_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Child Sexual Assault Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delayed FIR. Conviction Under Section 354 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Outraging Modesty Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Sunil Raghunath Mhase, was convicted by the learned Sessions Judge, Thane, under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for outrag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Directors in Legal Metrology Case — Lack of Vicarious Liability. Directors of Colgate Palmolive cannot be prosecuted under Section 36 of Legal Metrology Act, 2009 without specific averments of their role in the offence.

The petitioners, including directors and former directors of Colgate Palmolive (India) Limited, along with a proprietor and a distributor, filed a pet...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Victim Testimony and Lack of Medical Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376(2)(d)(i)(n), 377, 323 IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by Christian Rajendran, Joy Rajendran, and Salomi Rajendran against their conviction and sentence under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award Rejecting Securities Claim on Grounds of Forum Shopping. Petitioners Contend That Regulatory Proceedings Against Clearing Member and Arbitration Against Depository Are Distinct, Allowing Simultaneous Pursuit Under Indemnity Principles.

This matter arises from a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay...