Search Results for "presumption under Section 139"

821 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 821 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted. Trial Court Erred in Not Framing Proper Points of Determination and Ignoring Legal Presumption in Favour of Complainant.

The appellant, original complainant Sunil Thukral, filed a criminal appeal against the judgment and order dated 19/01/2011 of the Judicial Magistrate ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Complainant Failed to Prove Debt or Liability. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 rebutted by accused's defence that cheque was blank and misused.

The appellant, Harendra Ramchandra Pathak, filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal of respondent no.1, Rajendra Ratan Mhatre, by the Judicial Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Appellant failed to establish that the loan of Rs.3,00,000 was legally recoverable debt under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, Arti Rajesh Karangutkar, filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal of respondent No.1, Anna Rocky Fernandes, by the Metropolitan Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Arises Upon Admission of Signature and Handwriting on Cheque and Promissory Note.

The case involves a criminal appeal filed by the original complainant, Mrs. Rosa Maria Fernandes, against the judgment and order dated 11.12.2008 pass...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Complainant's Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 applies when cheque and signature are admitted, shifting burden on accused to prove defence.

The case involves a criminal appeal filed by the complainant, Sukhalal Kumar, against the acquittal of the accused, Prakash B. Borkar, under Section 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Reverses Acquittal. The court held that the trial court erred in failing to apply the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and that the accused failed to rebut the presumption.

The appellant, Doshi Brothers, a proprietary concern, filed a private complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, against M/s...