Search Results for "penalty under Excise Rules"

419 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 419 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.

The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging SVLDRS-3 Demand for Interest Component Under Sabka Vishwas Scheme. Interest paid under protest prior to show cause notice is part of tax dues under Section 124(2) of Finance Act, 2019.

The Petitioner, National Centre for the Performing Arts, a public trust registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, and engaged in providin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Central Excise Clandestine Removal Case — CESTAT Order Upheld for Lack of Evidence. Allegation of removal of 1,687,585.511 kg of yarn without duty payment fails as Revenue could not prove clandestine removal beyond reasonable doubt.

The Principal Commissioner of Central GST & C. Ex., Daman Commissionerate, filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Modvat Credit Dispute — Capital Goods Credit Denial Set Aside. Rule 57Q of Central Excise Rules, 1944 interpreted to allow credit on capital goods used in manufacture of final products, even if not directly used in the manufacturing process.

The appellant, M/s. Reliance Industries Ltd., is engaged in the manufacture of various chemical products at its Hazira Manufacturing Complex. The comp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 129E Customs Act, 1962 Mandating Predeposit for Appeals. Challenge to Order-in-Original Dismissed as No Appeal Filed.

The Bombay High Court disposed of two writ petitions filed by Haresh Nagindas Vora and Sachin Laxmichand Shah, partners of M/s Bright International, c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 129E Customs Act, 1962 Mandating Predeposit for Appeals. Challenge to Order-in-Original Dismissed as No Hearing Opportunity Was Denied.

The petitioners, partners of M/s Bright International, challenged the constitutional validity of Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962, as amended by ...