Search Results for "null and void decree"

956 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 956 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Interim Application in Redevelopment Dispute – Plaintiff Seeks Eviction of Remaining Occupants under Development Agreement. Court Addresses Whether Non-Cooperating Occupants Can Be Compelled to Vacate Pending Suit Where Majority Have Already Vacated.

This matter arises from an interim application filed by the plaintiff, Ambit Life Style Homes LLP, in a suit for enforcement of a registered developme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — Sale Deed by GPA Holder Without Authority Declared Void. Court holds that a General Power of Attorney must expressly authorize sale of immovable property and that the burden of proving authority lies on the party relying on the GPA.

The case involves a regular first appeal filed by the defendants against the judgment and decree dated 24.02.2012 in O.S.No.2405/2010 passed by the XI...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance with Exemplary Costs for Suppression of Facts and Forum Shopping. Plaintiffs failed to disclose prior pending suit and obtained ex parte orders by misrepresentation, leading to dismissal and costs of Rs. 5 lakhs.

The plaintiffs, Anand Agarwal and Pramila Anand Agarwal, filed a Commercial Suit No. 614 of 2017 before the Bombay High Court seeking specific perform...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Division Bench Pronounces Judgment on Constitutional Validity of Karnataka Civil Courts (Amendment) Act, 2023 and Karnataka High Court (Amendment) Act, 2023. The Verdict on the Appeal and Connected Petition Remains Unstated in the Available Excerpt of the Judgment.

The Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, comprising Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice C.M. Poonacha, heard a writ appeal a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance Due to Non-Compliance with Order VI Rule 17 CPC and Lack of Pleading Readiness and Willingness. Plaintiff failed to amend plaint to incorporate essential facts regarding readiness and willingness to perform contract, leading to dismissal of suit.

The plaintiff, Neeta Sawant, filed a suit for specific performance of an Agreement for Sale dated 30th September 2016, by which the defendants agreed ...