Search Results for "notice under Section 25(3)"

354 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 354 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Condonation of Delay Application by Superintending Archaeologist in Land Acquisition Appeal. Delay of 718 days not sufficiently explained; mere administrative procedure not a valid ground for condonation.

The present application was filed by the Superintending Archaeologist seeking condonation of 718 days delay in filing the First Appeal against the jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows KSRTC Appeal in Property Tax Reassessment Case — Reassessment Notice After 14 Years Held Time-Barred. Commissioner's Power to Reopen Assessment Under Section 112-A(4) of Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 Must Be Exercised Within a Reasonable Period of 3 Years.

The Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC) appealed against a Single Judge order that upheld the Commissioner's power to reopen property t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Transfer Pricing Case Due to Non-Application of Mind by ITAT. Tribunal's order set aside for failing to consider the TPO's detailed analysis and rejecting comparables without proper reasoning under Section 92C of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appeal was filed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax - 6 under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cross-Examination in Customs Show Cause Proceedings - Right to Cross-Examine Witnesses Whose Statements Are Relied Upon Is a Fundamental Principle of Natural Justice

The petitioner, Kalpena Industries Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in manufacturing polyethylene/polypropylene ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Upholds Developer's Right to Fair Hearing. Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976 Requires Compliance with Natural Justice Before Revoking Development Rights.

The petitioners, M/s Darshan Jayant Builders (a partnership firm) and its partner Pritesh M. Jain, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...