Search Results for "mortgage priority"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "mortgage priority"

110 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 110 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses First Appeal in Partnership Firm Suit for Specific Performance - Plaint Rejection Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Upheld Due to Res Judicata. Subsequent Suit by Registered Firm Barred as Cause of Action Identical to Prior Dismissed Suit by Unregistered Firm Under Section 69(2) of Indian Partnership Act, 1932.

27 Feb 2026

The dispute originated from agreements for sale of a plot of land in Goa, where the appellant, initially an unregistered partnership firm, entered int...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Civil Revision Petition Against Trial Court's Failure to Consider Interim Injunction in SARFAESI Act Matter — Jurisdiction of Civil Court Barred Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

19 Feb 2026

The petitioners, Dr. Jaishith Jebakumar Manuel and Pon Manju Usha, filed a suit (O.S.No.118 of 2025) before the Principal District Munsif, Nagercoil, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds ESI Coverage for BCCI as 'Shop' Under ESI Act — Sports Body Engages in Systematic Commercial Activity. BCCI held to be a 'shop' under notification dated 18th September 1978 issued under Section 1(5) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, as it carries out systematic commercial activities including sale of tickets, broadcasting rights, and merchandise.

24 Jun 2022

The present appeal was filed by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) against the judgment and order dated 9th September 2021 passed by the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Admiralty Suit — Vessel Arrest Set Aside for Lack of Same Beneficial Ownership. The court held that the arrest of a vessel under admiralty jurisdiction requires proof that the vessel is in the same beneficial ownership as the charterer liable for the claim, and mere common control or management is insufficient.

9 Dec 2019

The case involves a commercial appeal filed by Rainbow Ace Shipping S.A. Panama, the registered owner of the vessel M.V. Rainbow Ace, against an order...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Order in SARFAESI Act Matter — Petitioner Lacks Locus Standi as Borrower's Leasehold Interest Not Affected. The court held that the petitioner, claiming to be the owner of the property leased to the borrower, had no locus standi to challenge the DRT order under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, as the lease was created after the mortgage and the petitioner was not a party to the proceedings.

28 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Sri Rameshchandra, claiming to be the owner of a property, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Ind...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Union of India's Second Appeal in Salt Land Dispute — Civil Suit Barred Under Section 4(2) of Salt Act, 1882. Exclusive Jurisdiction of Salt Commissioner Precludes Civil Court from Entertaining Suit for Declaration of Title and Possession of Salt Land.

16 Aug 2016

The Union of India, through the Deputy Salt Commissioner, filed a second appeal against the judgment of the District Judge, Thane, which confirmed the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Probate Caveat Case — Real Brother Has Caveatable Interest as Creditor and Under Family Settlement. Section 284 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 interpreted to include persons with slight interest in estate.

26 Jul 2016

The case involves an appeal against an order of a learned single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing a caveat filed by the appellant, Purushotta...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appellant's Specific Performance Suit for Lack of Readiness and Willingness — Agreement Holder Not Entitled to Equitable Relief. Concurrent findings affirmed that appellant failed to prove readiness and willingness under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

19 Aug 2014

The dispute pertains to a house property allotted by the Karnataka Housing Board (KHB) to the respondent, Venkateshulu, in 1989. The appellant, Smt H ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeals and Cross Objection in Specific Performance and Possession Dispute Over KHB Allotted House. Agreement Holder Fails to Prove Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

19 Aug 2014

The case involves a dispute over a house property allotted by the Karnataka Housing Board (KHB) to the respondent, Venkateshulu, in 1989. The appellan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Sales Tax Auction of Property Already Secured Under SARFAESI Act. Securitisation Act Overrides State Revenue Recovery Laws Under Section 35, and Sale Must Be Conducted by Secured Creditor.

17 Nov 2011

The petitioners, Viraat Ispat Limited and another, challenged an auction notice dated 13 September 2011 issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Sales ...

9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)