Search Results for "market fee"

478 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 478 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Coal Supply Dispute — No Ground for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Court upholds award of damages for short supply of coal, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

The petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed by Mahaguj Collieries Ltd. (original respondent) challenging an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Arrest Under PML Act — Validity of Arrest Under Section 19 PML Act Must Be Examined by Trial Court at Remand Stage

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by Arvind Kejriwal challenging his arrest by the Directorate of Enforcement (DoE) under Section 19 of the Prevention...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petitions Against Dismissal of Application for Return of Plaint for Want of Pecuniary Jurisdiction. Suit for Permanent Injunction Valued at Rs.1,000 for Non-Agricultural Land Held to Be Under-Valued, Directing Return of Plaint for Presentation Before Proper Court.

The case involves two civil revision petitions filed by the defendants against orders passed by the Civil Judge and JMFC, Banahatti, dismissing their ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Court Fees Dispute for Injunction Suit. Suit for Simplicitor Injunction Falls Under Section 6(iv)(j) of Bombay Court Fees Act, Not Section 6(iv)(d) for Possession.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the Plaintiffs (Lalchand Kalro and others) against the Respondents (Neeraj Lalchand Kalro and others) chall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case, Reduces Enhanced Compensation. Court holds that mere potentiality of land for non-agricultural use does not justify compensation at rates comparable to developed plots without evidence of comparable sales.

The case involves multiple first appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Maharashtra for a housing scheme under th...