Search Results for "leasehold rights"

360 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 360 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Demand on Development Agreement Not Constituting Conveyance. Development agreement held not liable to stamp duty as a conveyance under Article 5 of Schedule I of the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958, since it did not transfer ownership or leasehold rights.

The petitioner, M/s Vaibhav Corp. Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958, ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows De-Sealing of Commercial Premises in PIL Based on Judicial Committee Order. Applicant's Premises Ordered to be De-Sealed Subject to Compliance with Common Order Dated 18.12.2023.

The present application (I.A. No.203615 of 2024) was filed by an individual applicant seeking de-sealing of his commercial premises located at plot No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Determines True Interpretation of Common Plots Conveyance in Favor of Co-owner Societies. The expression 'tenants in common' in the conveyance indicates absolute co-ownership, not a lease, and MHADA retains no title.

The plaintiff, Vithalnagar Society Ltd, a co-operative housing society, filed an Originating Summons seeking determination of the true interpretation ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Auction Notice Issued by Town Panchayat for Lack of Authority Under Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964. Town Panchayat Cannot Auction Property Without Statutory Power and Without Following Due Process Under Section 70 of the Act.

The petitioners, who are residents and property owners in Arkalgud Town, challenged an auction notice dated 20.09.2021 issued by the Arkalgud Town Pan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Society's Section 9 Petition for Possession and Injunction Against Developer in Redevelopment Dispute. Court Holds That Disputed Questions of Title and Possession Cannot Be Decided in Summary Proceedings Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns two competing petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Rajawadi Arunodaya Co-operative ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Impleadment in Specific Performance Suit — Petitioners Not Necessary or Proper Parties Under Order I Rule 10(2) CPC. Leasehold Rights Acquired Pending Suit Are Subject to Lis Pendens and Do Not Entitle Impleadment.

The petitioners, Sandeep Ramesh Solanki and others, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Decides Surviving Issue on Interpretation of Government Notification in Land Reservation Dispute. The Court Examines Whether Lessee Entitled to Non-Cash Compensation Under 2004 Notification for Release of Reserved Land for Development.

The writ petition was filed by Mafatlal Industries Limited and its officer seeking directions to enforce a Government Notification dated 10-02-2004 th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Criminal Writ Petition Challenging Sessions Court's Revision Order Against Issuance of Process. Order of Issuance of Process Under Section 204 CrPC is Interlocutory and Not Revisable Under Section 397(2) CrPC.

The petitioner, Sharad Vasant Sawant, filed a complaint under Sections 406 and 420 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 against respondent nos....