Search Results for "lease modification"

411 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 411 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal Against SIPCOT Land Cancellation — Lease Clause 14(i) Requires Show Cause Notice Before Resumption of Unutilized Land. SIPCOT's cancellation of 3.70 acres without prior notice violates natural justice; order set aside and matter remitted for fresh consideration.

The appellant, Kems Forging Ltd (formerly Sri Lakshmi Industrial Forge and Engineers Ltd), was allotted an industrial plot by SIPCOT on 05.12.2005, an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal by Lessee in Land Cancellation Case — SIPCOT's Resumption of Unutilized Land Upheld. Clause 14(i) of Lease Deed Permits Cancellation of Allotment for Non-Use; Appellant Failed to Prove Industrial Utilization of Excess Land.

The appellant, Kems Forging Ltd (formerly Sri Lakshmi Industrial Forge and Engineers Ltd), was allotted an industrial plot by SIPCOT on 05.12.2005, an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against High Court Order Restoring DRO's Cancellation of Patta in Favour of WSIL. Land Acquisition by State Vests Title Absolutely, DRO Cannot Adjudicate Title in Summary Proceedings.

The Supreme Court considered appeals against a Division Bench judgment of the Madras High Court that had restored an order of the District Revenue Off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reopen Consent Terms. Consent Terms Recorded in Earlier Suit Are Binding and Cannot Be Reopened Without Proof of Fraud or Collusion Under Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC.

The appellant, Mrs. Geeta Patkar, filed First Appeal No. 18 of 2014 against the judgment and order of the trial court in Special Civil Suit No. 55 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Against National Sports Club of India Construction, Upholding Environmental and Municipal Permissions. Court finds no violation of CRZ or heritage regulations and rejects allegations of illegal construction as motivated by private interests.

The petitioner, Society for Promotion of Equality, Awareness and Rights (SPEAR), filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court seeki...