Search Results for "katha transfer"

115 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 115 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for declaration and possession dismissed as plaintiff failed to prove title and possession.

The case involves a property dispute between Mahaboob Bi (appellant) and the legal representatives of Sharfunnisa (respondents). The appellant filed a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Consolidation Orders Under Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 — Petitioners Failed to Challenge Earlier Orders in Time, and Subsequent Orders Were Merely Consequential.

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a letter dated 2nd February 1990 and a notice dated 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration of Title and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property.

The appellants (plaintiffs) filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Sets Aside Concurrent Findings on Declaration and Possession. Court holds that the First Appellate Court failed to frame proper points for determination under Order 41 Rule 31 CPC, rendering its judgment unsustainable.

The appellant, Sri Gundappa, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenging the judgment and decree da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Demolition Order Against Partnership Firm in BBMP Property Dispute — Lack of Proper Notice and Violation of Natural Justice. Demolition of Building Without Giving Opportunity of Hearing Held Illegal Under Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976.

The petitioners, M/s. Raghava Reddy and Associates, a partnership firm, along with its partners, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of th...