Search Results for "investigation detention period"

634 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 634 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay. The court held that a 34-day delay between the proposal and the detention order, without proper explanation, vitiates the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority under Section 3(1) of the MPDA Act.

The petitioner, Balaji Hanumant Pawar, challenged a detention order dated 10th March 2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Solapur under Section 3(1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Default Bail to Accused Arrested After Charge-Sheet Filing in Further Investigation. Right to Default Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC Applies to Accused Arrested During Further Investigation, Not Extinguished by Prior Charge-Sheet Filing.

The Bombay High Court, in a referral order, resolved a conflict between two Single Judge decisions regarding the applicability of default bail under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in SEBI PFUTP Regulations Case Due to Non-Disclosure of Investigation Report. The Court Held That the Investigation Report Under Regulation 9 Must Be Disclosed to Ensure a Fair Hearing Under Principles of Natural Justice, as It Forms the Basis for the Show Cause Notice.

The dispute arose from a show cause notice issued by SEBI to the appellant, alleging violations of the SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Under MPDA Act for Lack of Evidence of Public Order Disturbance. Sand Smuggling and Criminal Acts Do Not Automatically Justify Preventive Detention as They Pertain to Law and Order, Not Public Order.

The petitioner, Baliram s/o Namdeo Bedke, challenged his preventive detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Default Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC Despite Subsequent Filing of Chargesheet. Indefeasible Right Accrues on Expiry of Statutory Period and Filing of Bail Application Before Chargesheet.

The appellant, M. Ravindran, was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 04.08.2018 for offences under the NDPS Act. Under Section 36A(4) of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition in Customs Act Detention Case — Detention Held Not Illegal. Petitioner's arrest under Section 104 of Customs Act, 1962 and subsequent judicial custody were lawful; no violation of Articles 14, 21, 22 of Constitution found.

The petitioner, Ankit Ghanshyam Mutha, filed a writ petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus and direction for his release from custody of the Directo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses CBI's Petition for Cancellation of Bail in Illegal Mining Case — Computation of 90 Days Under Section 167 Cr.P.C. Commences from Date of Production Before Court, Not from Service of Body Warrant on Jail Authorities.

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) filed a criminal petition under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking can...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act for Non-Consideration of Representation and Non-Application of Mind. Detenu's representation dated 7-9-2004 was not considered by the detaining authority, and the detention order disclosed total non-application of mind.

The petitioner, Sanpreet Kaur Tejpal Singh, wife of the detenu Tejpal Mann Singh, challenged the detention order dated 6-2-2004 passed by respondent N...