Search Results for "inam land"

162 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 162 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Property Title Dispute — Upholds Ownership but Modifies Compensation Sharing. High Court's direction to share 30% compensation with unauthorized allottees set aside as owner cannot be forced to share compensation for his own land.

The case involves a property dispute over 1 acre and 12 guntas of land in Sy. No. 305/2, Kempapura Agrahara Inam village, Bangalore. The appellant, La...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Claiming Private Temple Ownership — Revenue Entries Do Not Confer Title Without Document of Title. The Court held that the plaintiff failed to prove the temple was private and that revenue entries alone cannot establish ownership under Section 100 CPC.

The appellant, Ramesh Das (since deceased, represented by legal representatives), filed a civil suit for declaration and perpetual injunction claiming...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers State Government's Leave Application for Regularization Policy in PILs. Court Examines Whether Draft Policy Violates MRTP Act and Whether Judicial Review Permits Interference with Policy Decisions.

The proceedings arise from two Public Interest Litigations (PIL No. 80 of 2013 and PIL No. 138 of 2012) before the Bombay High Court. In an earlier or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Land Revenue Dispute — Finds No Error in Revenue Authority's Order Based on Prior Civil Court Decree. Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title and Petition Barred by Delay and Laches.

The petitioners, legal heirs of Laxman Shankar Bandgar, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Deputy Collector (Land Reforms), Latur, dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Upheld. Court held that no substantial question of law arose under Section 100 CPC as the appellants failed to prove exclusive title and possession.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree of the first appellate court, which co...