Madras High Court Pronounces Common Order in Batch of Civil Revision Petitions Seeking Directions for Speedy Disposal of Interim Applications in Temple Land Disputes. The petitions, filed under Article 227 of the Constitution, sought directions to the Subordinate Judge, Karur, to dispose of pending interlocutory applications within a stipulated time frame.

High Court: Madras High Court
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The provided judgment excerpt only contains the title and prayers of multiple Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court. The petitioners seek directions for the expeditious disposal of interim applications pending in various suits before the Subordinate Courts in Karur, involving disputes related to temples and the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department. The court heard the matters and reserved judgment on 19.12.2025, later pronouncing the order. No substantive details of the facts, legal issues, arguments, or reasoning are available in the given text.

Issue of Consideration

downloaded (9)

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (02) 66

C.R.P.(MD)No.3632 of 2025 and batch

N.Senthilkumar

Mr.N.Shanmuga Selvam, Mr.P.Athimoolapandian, Mr.J.Ravindran (Additional Advocate General) assisted by Mr.J.K.Jayaseelan and Mr.P.Thambi Durai

K.Lakshmi and other petitioners

Arulmigu Balasubramaniya Swami Temple Devasthanam, Executive Officer, Assistant Commissioner, Joint Commissioner, Special Commissioner (HR&CE) and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil Revision Petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking directions for expeditious disposal of interlocutory applications in original suits before the Subordinate Judge, Karur.

Remedy Sought

Direction to trial court to dispose of interim applications within a time frame.

Filing Reason

Likely delay in disposal of interlocutory applications.

Procedural History

Civil revision petitions filed directly in High Court under Article 227. Heard and reserved on 19.12.2025. Pronounced on (date not given) February 2026.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Trademark Infringement Suit for Lack of Evidence of Use and Passing Off. Marks VIVACITY and VIVZ held not deceptively similar to registered mark VIVA under Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Pronounces Common Order in Batch of Civil Revision Petitions Seeking Directions for Speedy Disposal of Interim Applications in Temple Land Disputes. The petitions, filed under Article 227 of the Constitution, sought directions to th...