Search Results for "forcible sexual intercourse"

339 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 339 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Unreliable Prosecutrix Testimony and Lack of Medical Evidence. Conviction under Sections 376 and 506 IPC set aside as inconsistencies in evidence created reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Dattatray @ Kashinath Babaso Khatal, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, for offences under Sections 376 (rape) and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010383542014_1

The appeal was filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment dated 12.06.2014 and order of sentence dated 17...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Allegation of Sexual Assault Fails as Victim's Testimony Contradicted by Medical Evidence and Delay in FIR.

The appellant, Manikandan, was convicted by the Sessions (Fast Track Mahila) Judge, Namakkal, for offences under Sections 5(l) and 5(j)(ii) of the Pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape and Sexual Assault of Minor Girl Under POCSO Act and IPC. Victim's Testimony Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence, Despite Absence of Independent Witnesses.

The appellant, Babu @ Prabhakar Sakharam Karve, was convicted by the Designated Judge under the POCSO Act, Greater Mumbai, in POCSO Special Case No.48...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction for Rape and House Trespass After Appellant Served Sentence. Conviction under Sections 451 and 376 IPC Upheld Based on Consistent Testimony of Victim and Medical Evidence.

The appellant, Yogesh Janardhan Shinde, was convicted by the 1st Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan, for offences under Sections 451 (house tresp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Not Supporting Prosecution Case.

The appellant, Ashpak Lalmohammad Mohammad Ansari, was convicted under Section 376(2)(g) of the Indian Penal Code for gang rape and sentenced to ten y...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Medical Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376, 506 IPC and Sections 4, 6 POCSO Act set aside as prosecutrix's evidence was inconsistent and medical evidence did not support sexual assault.

The appellant, Arun Popatrao Pingale, was convicted by the Special Judge, Pune, under Sections 376 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Sections...