Search Results for "fiscal matter"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "fiscal matter"

463 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 463 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case: Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for facade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, or use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, M/s Alupuro Building Systems Pvt. Ltd., is a construction contractor that imports pre-coated Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and under...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging GST Summons Issued Without Jurisdiction — Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction Renders Proceedings Void Ab Initio. The court quashed summons under Section 70 of CGST Act, 2017 issued by an officer in Coimbatore to a Nagpur-based company, holding that the officer lacked territorial jurisdiction.

6 May 2026

The petitioner, M/s D P Jain & Co. Infrastructure Private Limited, a Nagpur-based company, challenged summons issued by the Senior Intelligence Office...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction of Tenants in Maharashtra Rent Control Act Case for Non-Payment of Rent and Subletting. Concurrent findings of fact on default and unauthorized subletting under Sections 15, 16, 17 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, affirmed by High Court, not interfered with by Supreme Court.

1 Jan 2026

The batch of appeals arose from eviction decrees passed against tenants under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. The appellants, tenants of indus...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Explanations to Rule 38 of MCR, 2016 and Rule 45(8)(a) of MCDR, 2017 — Royalty Computation on Gross Sale Value Without Deduction of Royalty, DMF, and NMET Contributions is Valid. The Court held that royalty is a tax and not a contractual consideration, and the impugned explanations do not violate Article 14 or Article 265 of the Constitution.

15 Nov 2024

The petitioners, Kirloskar Ferrous Industries Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the validity...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Cheating and Forgery Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute. Dispute over property sale agreement held to be purely civil, not criminal, under Sections 420, 456, 466, 468, 471, 120B of IPC.

8 Jul 2022

The petitioners, family members of Late Thimmarayappa, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution read with Section 482 CrPC...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reverses High Court Decision on Suit for Permanent Injunction - Title Dispute Not a Bar to Injunction Suit. The Court held that a suit for permanent injunction simpliciter can be maintainable even when title is disputed, depending on the complexity of the title issues, as per principles established in Anathula Sudhakar v. P. Buchi Reddy, and remanded the case for fresh consideration.

7 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from a civil appeal before the Supreme Court, where the appellant-plaintiff challenged a High Court judgment that allowed an appeal ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cash Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11B(2) Proviso (c) When Credit Cannot Be Utilized Due to Exempted Final Products. The court held that clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 permits cash refund of credit on inputs where the assessee is unable to utilize such credit, overruling the contrary view in Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Jain Vanguard Polybutylene Ltd.

14 Jun 2019

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to resolve a conflict regarding the interpretation of clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 50C of Income Tax Act, 1961 in Stamp Duty Dispute. Development Agreement Stamp Duty Based on Ready Reckoner Rate Upheld; Section 50C Not Ultra Vires.

15 Mar 2010

The petitioner, Bhatia Nagar Premises Cooperative Society Limited, is a cooperative society that owns land with a building. It entered into a Developm...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Union of India in Section 17A Challenge — Prior Approval Requirement for Investigating Public Servants is Constitutionally Valid. Read Down to Mandate Independent Screening; Lokpal to Approve for Covered Public Servants.

1 Jan 1970

The writ petition was filed by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 17A of the Prevention of C...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)