Search Results for "fair prices"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "fair prices"

445 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 445 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeals for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Market Value Enhanced from Rs. 60,000 to Rs. 1,00,000 per Hectare. The Court held that the Reference Court failed to consider potentiality of land and comparable sale instances, warranting enhancement under Section 23 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

3 Mar 2020

The case involves three first appeals filed by the original claimants (Ushabai Pawar, Manesh Pawar, and Balasaheb Pawar) against the State of Maharash...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Transmission Corporation and Regulatory Commission in Electricity Tariff Disputes. Wheeling Charges and Grid Support Charges Upheld as Valid Levies Under Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1998.

29 Nov 2019

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of appeals concerning the levy of wheeling charges and grid support charges by the Transmission Corporation o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Claimants' Appeal in Part and Dismisses State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value of Rs. 1,00,000 per Hectare Upheld with Reduced Deduction for Small Landholders. Court Relies on Precedent for Same Village and Modifies Development Charges Deduction from 30% to 20% for Landholders with Less Than 2 Hectares.

27 Sep 2022

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, for the Katepurna Morna Project in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Drug Price Control Demand Against Pharmaceutical Company. Cream Vs. Ointment Distinction and Small Scale Industry Exemption Under DPCO 1995 Considered.

23 Dec 2016

The writ petition arose from a dispute concerning the drug price control regime under the Drugs (Price Control) Order, 1995 (DPCO 1995). The first pet...

Supreme Court

Presidential Reference Made to Supreme Court Seeks Advisory Opinion on Telecom Licences and Spectrum Allocation Policies. Reference Under Article 143(1) Recites Historical Grant of Licences from 1994 to 2008 Including First-Come-First-Served and Revenue Share Regimes.

12 Apr 2012

Background: The President of India made a reference under Article 143(1) of the Constitution on 12.04.2012, seeking the advisory opinion of the Suprem...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation Based on Actual Income Under Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The court held that the structured formula under Section 163A read with Schedule II is mandatory but actual income of the deceased must be used for computation, not notional income.

17 Sep 2013

The appellant, The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., challenged the judgment and award dated 18 November 2009 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Termination and Debarment of Contractor in Coal Mining Contract Dispute — Failure to Provide Reasonable Opportunity and Non-Application of Mind Renders Termination Order Invalid. The court held that termination of a work order without considering the contractor's explanation and without providing a hearing violates principles of natural justice and contractual provisions for extension of time under Clause 6.4 of the tender conditions.

16 Mar 2022

The petitioner, M/s Sainik Mining and Allied Services Limited, a company engaged in mining and excavation, was awarded a work order by Western Coalfie...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute — Holds That Arbitral Tribunal Erred in Rejecting Claims Without Proper Consideration of Contractual Provisions and Evidence. The court found that the tribunal's interpretation of the price variation clause, extra items, and compensation for delay was perverse and contrary to the plain language of the contract, warranting interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

17 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Chenab Bridge Project Undertaking, a joint venture contractor, was awarded a construction contract by the respondent, Konkan Railway C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Bid Rejection as Nonresponsive Due to Blacklisting by Another Entity. The Court held that blacklisting by a separate entity cannot be a ground to treat a bid as nonresponsive unless the tender conditions expressly require clearance from all government entities.

7 Dec 2016

The petitioner, M/s. Mahendra Realtors and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the action of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Family Settlement Dispute — Upholds Validity of Pre-Emptive Right Clause. Clause requiring written concurrence of all co-sharers before sale to third party is valid and binding; High Court erred in holding it vague and void.

20 Aug 2019

The dispute arose from a family settlement dated 31.03.1982 among three brothers, including the appellant Tilak Raj Bakshi (plaintiff), the first defe...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)