Search Results for "exclusive marks"

440 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 440 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Infringement of Well-Known Mark 'Raymond' in Domain Name for Dissimilar Goods; Discusses Scope of Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Domain Name 'raymondpharma.com' Not Found to Infringe 'Raymond' Mark Under Section 29(4) Due to Dissimilar Goods and Prior Litigation Bar.

The dispute arose from the Plaintiff Raymond Limited's claim that the Defendant Raymond Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. infringed its well-known registered t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Design and Trademark Infringement Suit — Plaintiff's Registered Designs and Trademark Protected Against Alleged Imitation. Court Restrains Defendants from Using Identical or Deceptively Similar Designs and Marks on Kitchen Appliances.

The plaintiff, Maya Appliances Private Ltd., filed a suit and notice of motion seeking interim injunction against Jaipan Industries Limited and others...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Temporary Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit. Phonetic similarity between 'PLAXO' and 'PLASTO' held sufficient to grant injunction under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The present appeal arises from an order dated 15/02/2018 passed by the learned District Judge-8, Nagpur, allowing an application for temporary injunct...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit Alleging Deceptive Similarity in Beer Trade Marks. Plaintiff Claims 'Hercules Black Label' Infringes 'Kalyani Black Label'.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore heard an appeal filed by United Breweries Ltd (plaintiff) against the judgment and decree of the XXV Addition...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Release of Imported Goods in Trademark Dispute, Directs Customs to Not Withhold Clearance Based on Pending Civil Suit. Customs Authorities Cannot Refuse Clearance Solely Due to Private Trademark Dispute; Remedy Lies in Civil Court Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The petitioners, UPS Sales and Suzhou Dake Machinery Company Ltd., imported goods under Bill of Lading No. EXSH2310608. The customs authorities (respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Trademark Dispute Due to Investigation by Unauthorized Officer. Violation of Section 115 Trade Marks Act, 1999 Rendered Proceedings Invalid.

The applicant, Shrenik Shantilal Dhadiwal, proprietor of a firm, faced criminal prosecution arising from FIR No. 97/2003 registered at Shrirampur City...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit Despite Defendant's Preliminary Objections. Plaintiff's Mark 'ESSEL' Found to Have Acquired Distinctiveness and Defendant's Use Likely to Cause Confusion.

The plaintiff, Essel Propack Ltd., filed a suit in 2010 against Essel Kitchenware Ltd. and another defendant for trademark infringement and passing of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Temporary Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case. Trial Court's Discretion Not Found Arbitrary or Perverse in Restraining Use of Deceptively Similar Mark 'Shriphal'.

The appeal arises from an order of the trial court granting a temporary injunction in favor of the respondent/plaintiff, M/s Mysore Deep Perfumery Hou...