Search Results for "excess pension recovery"

120 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 120 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Correction of Date of Birth by Employer at Fag End of Service. Employer's Right to Correct Date of Birth Not Subject to Five-Year Limitation; Preponderance of Evidence Supported Correct Date as 14/07/1946.

The petitioner, Mayaram Sahajram Sadhwani, was appointed as Octroi Inspector with the Municipal Council, Karanja (Lad), District Washim. His date of b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Land Grabbing Case Due to Application of Res Judicata. Prior Civil Court Decree Conclusively Determined Title and Possession, Barring Re-litigation Under Section 8 of Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982.

The dispute originated from an application filed by the legal heirs of S.V. Srinivasulu Naidu under Section 8 of the Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employee's Petition for Higher Pay Scale and Pensionary Benefits Despite Not Passing Departmental Examination. Exemption Granted Under Government Resolutions for Employees Above 45 Years of Age Cannot Be Ignored for Grant of Benefits.

The petitioner, Ramesh s/o Channapa Kompalli, was appointed as a Junior Clerk in the office of respondent No.4 on 4th March, 1985 and later promoted t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders in Unfair Labour Practice Complaints. Summary jurisdiction under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act does not bar determination of disputed employer-employee relationship when status is prima facie established.

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by Birla Cotsyn (India) Ltd., the employer, challenging identical orders passed by the Labour Court a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Tribunal's Refusal to Approve Dismissal in Gold Smuggling Case. Tribunal's Finding of Unfair Enquiry and Perverse Findings Upheld Under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Air India Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 22nd July 2004 passed ...