Search Results for "excess expenditure"

486 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 486 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Provision for Unascertained Liabilities is Invalid.

The petitioner, Bajaj Auto Limited, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2016-17 on 29 November 2016, declaring total income of Rs. 4,860,25...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee in Income Tax Reference Under Section 256(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Profits on Sale of Machinery Not Taxable Under Section 41(2) as Depreciation Was Claimed by Dissolved Firm, Not by Assessee.

The case involves a reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, for the opinion of the Bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Investigation into MLA's Assets for Lack of Credible Material. Court holds that mere allegations of disproportionate assets without prima facie evidence cannot justify investigation under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The petitioner, Sanjay Dinanath Tiwari, filed a Public Interest Litigation in the Bombay High Court seeking investigation into the financial affairs o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 seeking to quash CBI FIR for disproportionate assets under Prevention of Corruption Act; the court examined the scope of Section 13 and the effect of investigation delay. Final outcome not available in the provided excerpt.

The writ petition was filed by a sitting MLA and former Minister of Karnataka, who challenged the FIR registered by the Central Bureau of Investigatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Toll Road Tender and Concession Period. Policy decisions regarding toll collection and concession periods are not subject to judicial review unless arbitrary or mala fide.

The petitioner, Nandu Sambaji Nagarkar, a social worker, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging th...