Search Results for "estoppel against statute"

519 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 519 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Trade Circulars Restricting CST Exemption to Registered Dealers. State Government Cannot Grant Exemption for Inter-State Sales to Unregistered Dealers Under Section 8(5) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 After 2002 Amendment.

The petitioners, Prism Cement Limited and its shareholder/director, filed a writ petition challenging three trade circulars issued by the Commissioner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging OROP Policy Implementation for Ex-Servicemen. Periodic Revision Every Five Years Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

The dispute arose from a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the implementation of the One Rank One Pension (OROP) policy for ex...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Rules on Arbitration Petition No.846 of 2014 Under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act. The Court Considers Whether the Arbitral Award Dated 22 March 2014 Should Be Set Aside in Light of Various Share Sale Agreements Between the Parties.

The matter before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay arose from an arbitration petition filed by Haresh Advani under Section 34 of the Arbitration...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Regular Second Appeal Against First Appellate Order Setting Aside Decree for Name and Caste Correction. First Appellate Court Set Aside Trial Court Decree Holding Suit Not Maintainable, and the High Court Examines Jurisdictional Questions.

The litigation arose when a minor plaintiff, through his father as guardian, filed a suit seeking a declaration that his correct name was 'Aarush' and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 5204 OF 2019

The present writ petition was filed by six petitioners, including two public limited companies and four individuals, challenging an order dated 30.05....