Search Results for "controlling interest"

551 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 551 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Licensing Conditions on Orchestra Bars Under Maharashtra Police Act, 1951. Gender-Based Numerical Restrictions on Performers Held Valid as Reasonable Restrictions in Public Interest Under Article 19(6) of the Constitution.

The appeals arose from a judgment of the High Court of Bombay that upheld conditions imposed by the Commissioner of Police, Brihan Mumbai, on orchestr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Postal Department, Holds Gramin Dak Sewaks Entitled to Gratuity Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Voluntary Resignation Does Not Bar Gratuity as Section 4(1)(b) of the Act Overrides Rule 6(13) of the Gramin Dak Sewak (Conduct & Engagement) Rules, 2011.

The Supreme Court considered two appeals arising from the Punjab & Haryana High Court concerning the entitlement of Gramin Dak Sewaks (GDS) to gratuit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Flyover Construction on Environmental Grounds — Held That Project Did Not Require Environmental Clearance as It Was a Linear Project on Existing Highway.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the construction of a flyover and road widening project on ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Gratuity Award for Non-Seasonal Employees in Ginning Factory. Employees working as Wireman and Press Driver held entitled to gratuity at fifteen days' wages per year under Section 4(2) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, not seven days per season.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Madhaodas Jankidas Mohta Ginning and Pressing Factory (the employer) challenging orders of the Controlli...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Gratuity Recovery Orders Against Municipal Corporation Employees. Gratuity Act Section 7(4-A) Recovery Not Barred by Limitation Act; Employer's Failure to Deposit Amount Attracts Interest.

The petitioners, former employees of the Hubli-Dharwad Municipal Corporation, challenged the recovery orders passed by the Deputy Commissioner and App...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Gratuity Award in Transport Business Dispute. Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 applies to establishments with branches outside Maharashtra as long as the establishment is within the state.

The petitioner, M/s. Rahul Transport Pvt. Ltd., a transport company with its head office in Amravati, Maharashtra, challenged an order dated 18.10.200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Creditor's Full Decree, Clarifying 'Same Creditor' Requirement Under Madras Agriculturists' Relief Act. Renewal of Promissory Note in Favour of Bank Controlled by Original Creditor Fails to Meet Identity Requirement Under Explanation III to Section 8 of the Act.

The litigation originated from a suit for recovery of money based on a promissory note executed by the appellant, K. V. Srinivasa Ayyangar, in favour ...