Search Results for "contradictory certificates"

193 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 193 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cross-Cases of Land Dispute Violence — Benefit of Doubt Given Due to Inconsistent and Interested Testimony. Conviction under Sections 326, 324, 323, 504, 114 IPC and Section 3(1)(10) SC/ST Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Gujarat appealed against the acquittal of the respondents-accused in two interconnected cross-cases arising from a land dispute. The inci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Atrocity Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Acquits Appellants Under SC/ST Act. Conviction under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 504, 506(2) IPC and Sections 3(1)(x), 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act set aside for lack of credible testimony.

The present criminal appeal was filed by the appellants, originally accused in Atrocity Sessions Case No.37 of 2001, challenging their conviction by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Prosecution Failed to Prove Offences Under Sections 366A and 376 IPC Beyond Reasonable Doubt as Victim's Testimony Was Unreliable and Medical Evidence Did Not Support Allegations.

The appellant, Kadamban, was convicted by the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Tumkur, in S.C. No. 274/2012 for offences under Sections 366A (kidn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Caste Scrutiny Committee's Order Invalidating 'Khatik' Scheduled Caste Certificate. The Court held that the Committee's decision was based on proper appreciation of evidence and not perverse, and that the petitioner failed to prove his caste claim.

The petitioner, Uttam Shivdas Jankar, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 24th March 2014 passed by the Scheduled Castes, De-notified Tr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Freedom Fighter's Pension from Date of Application in Hyderabad Mukti Sangram Case. State Government directed to pay arrears from 1995 application date, Central Government to decide claim within three months.

The petitioner, Madrawati d/o Arjun Kshirsagar, an 88-year-old participant in the Hyderabad Mukti Sangram (1947-48), filed a writ petition seeking fre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Husband in Wife's Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inconsistencies in Testimony. Conviction under Sections 302 and 498-A IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Apparao Bahadurrao Ghuge, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Washim, for offences punishable under Sections 498-A and 302 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Probate Granted to Executors of Will — Will Proved in Manner Required by Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of Evidence Act, 1872

The appeal arose from a probate proceeding concerning the Will of Purvez Burjor Dalal, a Parsi who died on 7th December 2011. The appellant, Manek Dar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Double Murder and Robbery Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Chain of Circumstances Complete and Accused Failed to Explain Incriminating Facts Under Section 313 CrPC.

The appellant, Rajesab Mujawar, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, North Goa, Panaji in Sessions Case No. 20/2008 for the murder of Shekappa Bhandar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956 for Debt Disputed in Good Faith. Petition Filed to Exert Pressure for Unreasonable Demands, Not for Recovery of Genuine Debt.

The petitioner, Fomento Resorts And Hotels Ltd., filed a winding up petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 against the respondent, G...