Bombay High Court Allows Freedom Fighter's Pension from Date of Application in Hyderabad Mukti Sangram Case. State Government directed to pay arrears from 1995 application date, Central Government to decide claim within three months.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 84
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Madrawati d/o Arjun Kshirsagar, an 88-year-old participant in the Hyderabad Mukti Sangram (1947-48), filed a writ petition seeking freedom fighters' pension under both State and Central Government Schemes. She had applied on 03.02.1995 and again on 03.02.2004, but the State Government sanctioned her pension only on 30.05.2018, and the Central Government had not yet decided her claim. The petitioner argued that pension should be granted from the date of application, relying on Mukundlal Bhandari v. Union of India, AIR 1993 SC 1927, which held that grant of pension from the date of application is the rule. The respondents contended that the petitioner had not produced the certificate of imprisonment earlier, and that pension could only be granted from the date of sanction. The Court analyzed the scheme and the precedent, noting that the government's delay in verification cannot be held against the applicant. The Court allowed the petition, directing the State to pay arrears from 03.02.1995 under the State Scheme within three months, and directed the Central Government to decide the petitioner's application for Central pension within three months, considering the State's sanction as a relevant factor.

Headnote

A) Freedom Fighters' Pension - Date of Entitlement - Arrears from Date of Application - The petitioner, a participant in Hyderabad Mukti Sangram, applied for pension on 03.02.1995 but pension was sanctioned only on 30.05.2018 under the State Scheme. The Court held that pension should be granted from the date of application, as delay in verification by the government cannot prejudice the applicant. Reliance placed on Mukundlal Bhandari v. Union of India, AIR 1993 SC 1927, which held that grant of pension from date of application is the rule. The Court directed payment of arrears from 03.02.1995 under the State Scheme and also directed consideration of the Central Scheme application. (Paras 1-11)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to freedom fighters' pension under the State and Central Government Schemes from the date of her application (03.02.1995) instead of from the date of sanction (30.05.2018), and whether delay in producing the imprisonment certificate justifies denial of arrears.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. Respondent No.1 (State of Maharashtra) is directed to pay arrears of pension under the State Scheme from 03.02.1995 to 29.05.2018 within three months. Respondent No.4 (Ministry of Home Affairs) is directed to decide the petitioner's application for Central pension within three months, considering the State's sanction as a relevant factor.

Law Points

  • Freedom fighters' pension should be granted from the date of application
  • delay in verification by government not a ground to deny arrears
  • certificate of imprisonment produced late does not disentitle pension from application date
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (03) 15

WRIT PETITION NO. 2334 OF 2018

2019-02-14

S. V. Gangapurwala, A. M. Dhavale

V. S. Panpatte for petitioner, P. V. Diggikar for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2, A. B. Dhongade for respondent Nos. 3 and 4

Madrawati d/o Arjun Kshirsagar

The State of Maharashtra, The Collector Latur, Secretary/Chairman High Power Committee for grant of Freedom Fighters' Pension, The Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking freedom fighters' pension under State and Central Government Schemes.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought pension from the date of application (03.02.1995) under State Scheme and grant of pension under Central Scheme.

Filing Reason

Petitioner's pension under State Scheme was sanctioned only on 30.05.2018, and Central Scheme claim was pending; she sought arrears from 1995.

Previous Decisions

State Government sanctioned pension from 30.05.2018 during pendency of petition.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to freedom fighters' pension under the State Government Scheme from the date of her application (03.02.1995) instead of from the date of sanction (30.05.2018). Whether the Central Government should be directed to decide the petitioner's application for freedom fighters' pension under the Central Scheme.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that pension should be granted from date of application as per Mukundlal Bhandari v. Union of India, AIR 1993 SC 1927, and that delay in producing imprisonment certificate cannot deny arrears. Respondents argued that pension can only be granted from date of sanction as per scheme, and that petitioner failed to produce certificate of imprisonment earlier.

Ratio Decidendi

Grant of freedom fighters' pension from the date of application is the rule, and delay in verification by the government cannot be a ground to deny arrears. The certificate of imprisonment produced late does not disentitle the applicant from pension from the date of application.

Judgment Excerpts

The Government ought to have promptly verified her applications and should have granted pension from the date of application. Grant of freedom fighters' pension from the date of application is a rule. Inaction and delay on the part of the Government machinery in scrutiny of freedom fighters' pension cannot be sufficient to deny pension from the date of application.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed writ petition in 2018 seeking freedom fighters' pension under State and Central Schemes. During pendency, State sanctioned pension from 30.05.2018. Petitioner then limited claim to arrears from 03.02.1995 under State Scheme and grant under Central Scheme. Judgment reserved on 28.01.2019 and pronounced on 14.02.2019.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Freedom Fighter's Pension from Date of Application in Hyderabad Mukti Sangram Case. State Government directed to pay arrears from 1995 application date, Central Government to decide claim within three months.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Deposit Condition in Anticipatory Bail — Pre-Arrest Bail Cannot Be Used as Recovery Mechanism Under Section 438 CrPC in Cheating Case Under Section 420 IPC.