Search Results for "content over form"

929 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 929 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 2(24)(xviii) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Petitioner contended that taxing capital subsidies as income violates Articles 14, 19, 246, 265 and 289 of Constitution; final decision not stated in available text.

Serum Institute of India Private Limited, a biotechnology company manufacturing drugs and vaccines with a plant at Hadapsar, Pune, filed the writ peti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010006872022_1

The case arose from a criminal petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of proceedings in C.C.No.261...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.

The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reassessment Beyond Four Years Invalid Without Proof of Non-Disclosure Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, 3i Infotech Limited, challenged a notice dated 18 March 2009 issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax seeking to reopen the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sanjay s/o Ishwar Bhanushali, was convicted by the Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act) for Greater Mumbai for offences under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers to Three-Judge Bench the Question Whether Quantity of Mixture or Pure Drug Content Determines Punishment Under NDPS Act. The Court Held That E. Micheal Raj Requires Reconsideration as It Omitted Note 2 of Notification and the Scheme of the Act Treating Preparations as a Whole.

The Supreme Court, in a reference arising from multiple appeals and writ petitions, considered the correctness of the decision in E. Micheal Raj v. In...