Search Results for "consumer protection"

665 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 665 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Homebuyers' Appeal Against NCDRC Order Adjourning Consumer Complaint Sine Die; Moratorium Under Section 14 IBC Does Not Extend to Non-Corporate Debtor Respondents. Proceedings Against Directors, Promoters, and Landowners Can Continue Independently During CIRP of Developer.

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint filed by homebuyers (appellants) against Mantri Technology Constellations Pvt. Ltd. (Respondent No. 1) and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 12656 OF 2023

The writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India was filed by Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. against the order dated 31 July ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Leave Encashment to Retired Judge Appointed as President of State Consumer Commission. Petitioner entitled to leave encashment under Maharashtra Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 1981 for entire tenure, not limited to COVID-19 period.

The petitioner, Justice Ashok Pitambar Bhangale, a retired Judge of the Bombay High Court, was appointed as the President of the Maharashtra State Con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Land Owner's Appeal in Consumer Case, Holding No Joint Liability for Developer's Default. Collaboration Agreement and Tripartite Agreement Did Not Impose Obligation on Land Owner to Flat Buyers Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The appeals arose from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) allowing a complaint by flat buyers against a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MCGM's Challenge to MERC Regulation on Compensation for Delayed Electricity Connections. Regulation 4.10 requiring distribution licensees to pay compensation for failure to provide new connections within stipulated period is valid and not ultra vires the Electricity Act, 2003.

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), through its Brihanmumbai Electric Supply & Transport Undertaking (BES&T), filed a writ petition un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MCGM's Challenge to MERC Regulation on Compensation for Delayed Electricity Connections. Regulation 4.10 requiring compensation for failure to provide new connections within stipulated time is held valid under Section 181 read with Section 57 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), a statutory corporation and local authority, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Consti...