WRIT PETITION NO. 957 OF 2013
6 Jan 2017The petitioners, retired employees of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation, along with other slum dwellers, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the ...
Search Results for "composite premises"
336 result(s) found
Found 336 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging AGRC Order — Restores Termination of Developer for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Consents and No-Objection Certificate. Failure to Obtain Consent of 70% Municipal Tenants and Annexure-II from MCGM Justifies Termination Under Section 13(2) of Maharashtra Slums Areas Act, 1971.
10 Jun 2024The Bombay High Court allowed a writ petition challenging the order of the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee (AGRC) which had set aside the terminati...
- 583
High Court
Bombay High Court Admits Appeal Against Rejection of Interim Injunction in Suit Challenging Cancellation of Lease by Nagpur Improvement Trust — Dharmashala Allotment Dispute under Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936
6 May 2011The appeal arose from the rejection of a temporary injunction application by the trial court in a suit filed by a charitable trust against the Nagpur ...
Supreme Court
"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."
5 Nov 2024The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...
- 763
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Tenant's Interpretation of 'Cost of Construction' Under Madras Rent Control Act — Original Construction Cost Prevails Over Market Value. The expression 'cost of construction' in Section 4(3)(b)(i) of the Madras Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1960, denotes the original cost of construction, not the market value at the time of enactment, rendering the prescribed rules inconsistent.
18 Aug 1969The case involved the interpretation of the Madras Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1960, specifically the determination of fair rent for a non-r...
- 49
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against High Court's Order Regarding Development Licenses and Building Plans. Dispute Centers on Compliance with Town Planning Norms and Apartment Ownership Act.
1 Jan 1970The present batch of civil appeals, with the lead matter arising out of SLP(C) No. 11480 of 2020, originated from the judgment and order dated 10 July...
- 30
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Revisions in Ejectment Suit Under Bombay Rent Act Due to Concurrent Findings on Bona Fide Need. Landlords' Need for Premises for Family Vocation Not Limited to Specific Business Pleaded; Environmental Clearance Not Prerequisite for Decree.
8 Sep 2010The judgment disposes two civil revision applications filed by tenants challenging decrees of ejectment passed by the District Court in favour of the ...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree in Lease Dispute — Lease Not Renewed After Expiry, Tenancy Not Protected Under Rent Act. The court held that a lessee continuing in possession after lease expiry without renewal is not a tenant under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, and is liable to vacate.
23 Apr 2015The case involves a civil revision application challenging concurrent eviction decrees passed by the Small Causes Court and its Appeal Bench. The prop...
- 160
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Tenant Suit for Injunction — Finds Substantial Question of Law on Adverse Possession and Tenant Status. The court held that the Trial Court and First Appellate Court erred in dismissing the suit for injunction without properly considering the appellants' claim of tenancy and adverse possession, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.
12 Jun 2023The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed Regular Civil Suit No.131/1998 in the Court of the Civil Judge, Junior Division at Margao, seeking an injun...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Redevelopment Scheme Under DCR 33(7) — Consents Verified and Video Recorded. Tenants Who Refused to Vacate Were Issued Notices Under Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976; Court Found No Merit in Grievance.
23 Jun 2011The ten petitioners, occupants of a cessed structure on CS 1101, Khandia Street, Byculla, Mumbai, challenged a redevelopment scheme sanctioned by MHAD...
- 96
