Search Results for "cardio respiratory arrest"

138 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 138 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Homicidal Death. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as medical evidence did not rule out accidental drowning; conviction under Section 309 IPC for attempt to suicide upheld.

The appellant, Vasant Kusha Murkute, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad, Alibag for the murder of his wife Laxmibai under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Cruelty. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Narsing s/o Shankarrao Talnikar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nilanga, in Sessions Case No.10 of 2010 for the murder...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Nirmala Maruti Gunjal, Malanbai Ramesh Gunjal, Sakhubai Baban Shinde, and Maruti Ramesh Gunjal, were convicted by the 5th Additional S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Motive and Last Seen Circumstance.

The appellants, four accused persons, were convicted by the Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Kandhar, district Nanded, for the murder of one person u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Smt. Indubai Arjun Wagh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge at Vasai in Sessions Case No.65 of 2009 for the murder of Ganes...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder Based on Eye Witness Testimony and Motive — Conviction under Section 302 IPC for Sickle Attack on Neck Upheld.

The appellant, Jayram Laxman Baswat, was convicted by the Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Palghar, for the murder of Ladka (deceased) under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Convict in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness's testimony was inconsistent and uncorroborated.

The appellant, Shankar Maruti Bamne, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pandharpur, for the murder of Ranganath Karande under Section 302...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Inconsistencies in Prosecution Case. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Balya @ Baliram Shivram More, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Eyewitness Accounts and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Popat @ Bhujangrao Bhausaheb Mahurkar, Sou. Vandana Popat Mahurkar, and Kum. Meena Bhausaheb Mahurkar, were convicted by the V Ad-hoc ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in Kidnapping and Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 364, 387, 201 read with 120B IPC confirmed as chain of circumstances was complete and motive established.

The appellant, Raju @ Doctor Vyankatswami, along with co-accused Somnath, Rufas, Yogesh, and Naresh, was tried for offences under Sections 120-B, 364,...