Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Homicidal Death. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as medical evidence did not rule out accidental drowning; conviction under Section 309 IPC for attempt to suicide upheld.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Vasant Kusha Murkute, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad, Alibag for the murder of his wife Laxmibai under Section 302 IPC and for attempt to commit suicide under Section 309 IPC. The prosecution case was that the appellant's father, the complainant, heard cries of his grandchildren and found Laxmibai dead and the appellant with a self-inflicted injury on his neck. The appellant appealed against the conviction. The High Court examined the evidence and found that the medical evidence did not conclusively prove that the death was homicidal; it could have been accidental drowning. The court held that the prosecution failed to prove the homicidal death beyond reasonable doubt. However, the appellant's self-inflicted injury was proved, and the conviction under Section 309 IPC was upheld. The court allowed the appeal in part, setting aside the conviction under Section 302 IPC and maintaining the conviction under Section 309 IPC.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Section 302 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Homicidal Death - Prosecution failed to prove that death was homicidal as medical evidence did not rule out accidental drowning - Conviction set aside (Paras 4-6).

B) Criminal Law - Attempt to Suicide - Section 309 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Self-inflicted injury - Appellant caused injury to himself with scythe - Conviction upheld (Paras 2, 7).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 IPC for murder of his wife and under Section 309 IPC for attempt to commit suicide is sustainable in law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal partly allowed. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside. Conviction under Section 309 IPC upheld. Appellant to serve sentence for attempt to suicide.

Law Points

  • Homicidal death must be proved beyond reasonable doubt
  • Circumstantial evidence must form complete chain
  • Section 309 IPC does not require mens rea for attempt to suicide
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012 LawText (BOM) (08) 77

Criminal Appeal No.253 of 2006

2012-08-01

V.M. Kanade, P.D. Kode

Ms. Nasreen Ayubi for Appellant, Mr. S.R. Shinde - APP for the State

Vasant Kusha Murkute

The State (for Kusha Shiva Murkute, original complainant)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder and attempt to suicide

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from conviction under Sections 302 and 309 IPC

Filing Reason

Appellant challenged the judgment and order of conviction passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad, Alibag

Previous Decisions

Trial Court convicted appellant under Section 302 IPC (life imprisonment) and Section 309 IPC (one month simple imprisonment)

Issues

Whether the death of Laxmibai was homicidal or accidental Whether the conviction under Section 302 IPC is sustainable Whether the conviction under Section 309 IPC is sustainable

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the prosecution failed to prove homicidal death beyond reasonable doubt State argued that the conviction was based on evidence

Ratio Decidendi

For a conviction under Section 302 IPC, the prosecution must prove homicidal death beyond reasonable doubt. Medical evidence not ruling out accidental drowning fails to establish homicidal death.

Judgment Excerpts

The prosecution case in brief is that the Appellant got married with deceased Laxmibai 11 years prior to the date of the incident... The Trial Court convicted the Appellant for the offences punishable under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code... The medical evidence did not conclusively prove that the death was homicidal; it could have been accidental drowning.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad, Alibag on 22nd September 2005. He filed an appeal before the Bombay High Court, which was heard and decided on 1st August 2012.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 309
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Non-Payment of Compensation for Eucalyptus Trees Under KIADB Acquisition — Condition No.4 of Circular Dated 19.07.2001 Quashed as Arbitrary and Unreasonable. The court held that excluding eu...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Homicidal Death. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as medical evidence did not rule out accidental drowning; conviction under Section 309 IPC for attempt to suicide ...