Search Results for "capital asset"

575 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 575 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Section 50C Valuation Dispute, Remands Case for Fresh Adjudication. ITAT's Rejection of Valuation Officer's Report without Hearing Violated Audi Alteram Partem Under Income Tax Act.

The dispute arose from an income tax appeal filed by the Revenue against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 3 July 2009. The a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Allowability of Deduction and Depreciation Rate is Invalid.

The petitioner, Aventis Pharma Ltd., challenged a notice dated 16th March 2009 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, seeking to reopen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case Due to Assessee's Failure to Prove Revenue Expenditure. The court held that the assessee did not discharge its burden to show that the expenditure was revenue in nature under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case pertains to an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which had upheld the CI...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice for Club Membership Fees as Revenue Expenditure. Payment of entrance and subscription fees to Willington Sports Club held to be revenue expenditure, not capital expenditure, as it was for short-term membership renewal and did not create an enduring benefit.

The petitioner, Swiss Re Services India Pvt Ltd, filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated 29 March 2010 issued under Section 148 of the Income...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Block Assessment Case — Unexplained Investments Not Proven as Income. The court held that the Assessing Officer failed to establish that the cash credits and investments belonged to the assessee, and the ITAT correctly deleted the additions.

The case involves appeals by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal...