Search Results for "builders"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "builders"

1501 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1501 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction Suit Dismissal in License Dispute — Licensee's Heirs Entitled to Protection Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. The court upheld the concurrent findings that the legal heirs of a deceased licensee are protected under Section 15A of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, and the suit for eviction and compensation was rightly dismissed.

9 Jun 2026

The petitioner, M/s. Sharan Builders, a partnership firm, was the original plaintiff/licensor. The respondents are the legal heirs of the original def...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Specific Averments of Vicarious Liability. Directors of a company cannot be held liable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, without specific allegations that they were in charge of and responsible for the conduct of the business at the time the offence was committed.

6 Oct 2023

The case involves two criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of proceedings in C.C. No. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute — No Patent Illegality Found in Arbitrator's Interpretation of Contract Terms. The court held that the arbitrator's construction of the contract was a possible view and not perverse, thus no interference under Section 34(2-A) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

2 Mar 2020

The petitioners, Gateway Distriparks Limited and Gateway Rail Freight Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Challenge to Arbitral Award in Development Agreement Dispute — Upholds Award of Possession and Rent. The court held that the arbitral tribunal's findings on breach and rent computation were not patently illegal or against public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

27 Feb 2020

The case involves a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against an arbitral award dated 6th September 2019. The ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty Notice for Excavation of Ordinary Earth Without Permit — Holds That Prior Approval Under Section 21(6) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 Is Not Required for Government Companies Executing Railway Projects. The court found that the notice proposing penalty for excavation of minor mineral without permission was invalid as the petitioners were a Public Sector Undertaking of the Ministry of Railways and the excavation was for a public purpose.

29 Mar 2019

The petitioners, Ircon International Limited (a Public Sector Undertaking of the Ministry of Railways) and others, challenged a notice dated 4th Decem...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Joint Registrar's Order in Cooperative Housing Society Land Sale Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice and Bye-Laws. Permission for Sale of Society Land Granted Without Notice to Members or Proper Inquiry Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

6 May 2016

The petitioners, members of respondent No.4 housing cooperative society (Ahilyabai Magasavargiya Gruhnirman Sahakari Sanstha Ltd.), challenged the ord...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheating Case Against Real Estate Developers Due to Civil Nature of Dispute. Dispute over sale of property rights held to be purely civil, not criminal, under Sections 406, 420, 467 IPC.

9 Mar 2015

The petitioners, Deepak Vallabhji Dedhia and Jitendra Vallabhji Dedhia, were partners of M/s. Ketki Developers, a firm engaged in real estate. Respond...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Incentive FSI for Redevelopment of Cessed Buildings in Mumbai — Directs Strict Compliance with Safety and Environmental Norms. The court held that DCR 33(7) is valid but must be implemented with safeguards to prevent urban disruption and protect the right to life under Article 21.

17 Oct 2005

The judgment arises from a writ petition filed by three citizens of Mumbai challenging the validity of Development Control Regulation 33(7) which gran...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Construction Under MHADA Act — Petitioners Failed to Establish Legal Right Over Encroached Land. The court held that the respondents acted within their powers under the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976, and the petitioners were not entitled to any relief.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, M/s Twin & Deccan Builders and others, filed two writ petitions challenging the demolition of structures on land at Andheri, Mumbai, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Illegal Construction in Residential Zone. Unauthorized construction in residential zone without valid development permission is liable for demolition under MRTP Act and BMC Act.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Sharvan Developers Private Limited and others, and by Jayesh Mehta and others, challenging a demolition ...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)