High Court of Judicature at Madras Hears Writ Petition Challenging Penalty Order Passed Under Section 271D of Income Tax Act, 1961. The Penalty Was Imposed for Alleged Violation of Section 269SS Regarding Cash Loans.
25 Feb 2025...
Search Results for "banking returns"
147 result(s) found
Found 147 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Bank Management in Dispute Over Supervisory Allowance Claim by Head Cashiers Under Sastry and Desai Awards. Labour Court's Order Granting Special Allowance Set Aside as Head Cashiers' Duties Were Primarily Clerical and Any Supervisory Work Was Incidental.
24 Apr 1969The dispute arose between the Management of State Bank of Hyderabad and its head cashiers, who were respondents, regarding their claim to a special al...
- 62
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal on Deduction for Bank's Settlement of Claims for Stolen Pledged Jewellery. Payment to Constituents for Stolen Jewellery Held Allowable as Business Expenditure Under Section 10(2)(xv) of Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.
15 Sep 1966The case concerned a claim for deduction under Section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 by a bank for amounts paid to constituents whose p...
- 51
High Court
Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order on Constitutional Challenge to Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Assert Rules Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Freedom of Trade and Commerce Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 301 of the Constitution.
10 Nov 2016The Karnataka High Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka On-demand Transportation Techno...
- 66
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.
10 Nov 2016The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...
- 85
High Court
- 63
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Refund of IGST on Exports Under Protest, Rejects Unjust Enrichment Claim. Payment under protest does not attract doctrine of unjust enrichment under Section 54 of CGST Act, 2017.
8 Apr 2024The petitioner, Venus Jewel, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, challenging the refusa...
- 82
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Conditional Leave to Defend in Summary Suit for Recovery of Loan — Triable Issues Raised Regarding Limitation and Acknowledgment of Debt. Defendant's Application for Leave to Defend Allowed Subject to Deposit of 50% of Suit Amount Under Order XXXVII Rule 3(5) of CPC, 1908.
23 Feb 2021The plaintiffs, Carl Pinto De Andrade and others, filed a Commercial Summary Suit against Ventura Securities Limited for recovery of Rs. 1,00,00,000/-...
- 55
High Court
High Court Dismisses Appeal in MPID Act Attachment Case, Upholding Lower Court's Rejection of Stay Application Based on IBC Moratorium. Attachment Proceedings Under Section 8 MPID Act Not Stayed as They Aim to Protect Depositors' Interests, Not Recover Debt, and Do Not Overlap with Insolvency Proceedings Under IBC.
10 Mar 2026The appeal arose from an order dated 4th November 2023 passed by the Special Judge (MPID), City Civil & Sessions Court, Greater Bombay, rejecting ...
- 421
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Police Patil Under Prevention of Corruption Act — Police Patil Not a Public Servant Under Section 2(c) of the Act. Petitioner appointed under Maharashtra Village Police Act, 1967 held not to be a public servant within meaning of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
16 Mar 2017The petitioner, Atul Ramdas Dabare, was appointed as a Police Patil under the Maharashtra Village Police Act, 1967. An FIR was registered against him ...
- 42
