Search Results for "attempted robbery"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "attempted robbery"

128 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 128 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Railway Compensation for Passenger Injured While Deboarding Wrong Train — Negligence Not a Bar Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989. The court held that an accidental fall from a train while attempting to deboard a moving train constitutes an 'untoward incident' under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, and the Railway is strictly liable for compensation regardless of the passenger's negligence.

11 Nov 2022

The case involves two appeals filed by the Union of India, through the General Manager, Central Railway, challenging the decision of the Railway Claim...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Railway Appeal and Upholds Compensation for Accidental Fall from Train. Strict Liability Under Section 124A of Railways Act Applies, Even Without Proof of Railway's Fault, Where Ticket Found on Deceased.

4 Jul 2013

The appeal arose from the judgment and order of the Railways Claims Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, which awarded compensation of Rs. 4,00,000 to the dependen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case — Deemed Passenger Rule Applied. Death of a person found on railway premises with a valid ticket is an 'untoward incident' under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, and the burden to prove negligence is not on the claimant.

21 Sep 2010

The appellants, being the wife, minor son, and parents of the deceased Lahu Kotlapure, filed a claim application under Section 124 of the Railways Act...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench Hears Confirmation of Death Sentence and Criminal Appeal in POCSO Rape-Murder Case. Trial Court Convicted Accused Under Sections 376-A, 302 IPC and POCSO Act; High Court Reviews Death Reference and Appeal.

1 Jan 1970

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Hotel Liability for Theft of Guest's Car from Valet Parking Under Bailment and Infra Hospitium Principles. Insurer as Subrogee Can Maintain Consumer Complaint as Co-Complainant.

14 Nov 2019

The appeal arose from a consumer complaint filed by the insurer (United India Insurance Company Ltd.) and the car owner (Respondent No. 2) against the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal and Confirms Life Conviction for Murder Based on Dying Declaration and Circumstantial Evidence. Dying Declaration Found Voluntary and Credible, and Circumstantial Evidence Established Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 302 IPC.

6 Jan 2021

The appellant, Shivpujan Harishankar Yadav, was convicted by the trial court for the murder of his wife under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 18...

High Court

Bombay High Court Declares Respondent Vexatious Litigant Under Maharashtra Vexatious Litigation (Prevention) Act, 1971 for Habitually Filing Baseless Proceedings Against Tenant. Landlord-Tenant Dispute Leads to Declaration of Vexatious Litigant Due to Habitual Filing of Frivolous Applications and Abusive Conduct.

6 May 2011

The Advocate General for the State of Maharashtra filed a petition under Section 2(1) of the Maharashtra Vexatious Litigation (Prevention) Act, 1971, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Execution. The Court Held That a 19-Day Gap Between Passing and Service of Detention Order Without Explanation Violates the Detenu's Right to Make a Representation Under Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

18 Jan 2018

The petitioner, Vishnu @ Bablu Vasant Gawali, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-Of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Dependents of Deceased Granted Compensation for Untoward Incident. Death of a passenger at railway station while waiting to receive his son is an 'untoward incident' under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, and the burden of proving exception lies on the Railways.

2 Jan 2023

The appellants, dependents of the deceased Pruthviraj Gajbhiye, filed an appeal under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, against the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case — Death Due to Untoward Incident Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989. Parents of deceased son who died after being run over by train while crossing railway track held entitled to compensation as death was an 'untoward incident' under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, and the Railway Claims Tribunal erred in rejecting the claim on ground of negligence.

9 Nov 2022

The appellants, Ganesh Waman Waghmare and Kusum Ganesh Waghmare, are the parents of the deceased Shubham Ganesh Waghmare. They filed a claim for compe...

9 10 11 12 13

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)